Wolffsavage1808

7%), social life (64.4%), and romantic relationship (49.5%). Those who underwent breast augmentation were 4 times more likely to report that their sex life had been positively affected than those who did not undergo breast augmentation. The study provides evidence of improvement in an individual's satisfaction with his or her body image and self-confidence after cosmetic surgery. The study demonstrates the positive impact of cosmetic surgery to social life and relationships, especially breast augmentation surgery to sexuality.The objective of this study was to identify the occurrence of complicated surgical wounds (CSWs) and to analyze the associated factors in hospitalized patients at an oncology institution. This was an epidemiological, observational, cross-sectional, descriptive, and correlational study conducted in the intensive care and hospitalization units forming part of a large cancer hospital. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected from medical records and physical examinations of the skin. Associations between the dependent variable (presence of CSWs) and the independent variables were obtained by chi-square tests and odds ratio (OR) calculations with a 95% confidence interval. Logistic regression (LASSO) was used to verify the possible predictors of the outcome. The sample consisted of 341 patients, specifically individuals who are White (46.9%), married (53.4%), and men (58.1%) with an average age of 59.2 years. Complicated surgical wounds were present in 3.2% of patients, and the most frequent types of complications were dehiscence (40%), infection (26.7%), and fistula (20%) present in the abdominal (40%), cephalic (26.7%), and cervical (13.3%) regions. Senile purpura, diaper use, and infection were the clinical variables associated with the occurrence of CSWs (p = .044, p = .001, and p less then .001, respectively). Based on the logistic regression, the presence of infection (p less then .001; OR = 90.8; 95% CI [18.42, 538.79]) persisted as a predictor of the occurrence of CSWs. From these observations, recommendations regarding best practices for the prevention of CSWs are made, specifically for patients with cancer.Bioimpedance spectroscopy is currently used to evaluate patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). We aimed to describe published studies on the use of bioimpedance spectroscopy for assessment for BCRL. We queried the PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Embase databases to identify studies that evaluated the use of bioimpedance spectroscopy as an assessment tool. We searched for the keywords "bioimpedance" AND ("lymphedema" OR "lymphoedema"). We included English-language studies that reported the use of bioimpedance spectroscopy for assessment of BCRL. Out of 152, 116, and 235 articles identified in each database, respectively, only a total of 11 articles were included. Bioimpedance spectroscopy was studied as a method to assess and predict response to BCRL treatment, assess volume changes, and calibrate L-Dex scores for conversion to units of volume. All studies reported that bioimpedance spectroscopy is a promising tool for predicting response to BCRL treatment and measuring volume changes. Bioimpedance spectroscopy can be used for assessment of BCRL. However, the accuracy of bioimpedance spectroscopy for BCRL assessment has not been determined, and consequently further studies are needed.There are few studies comparing methods for pilonidal cyst closure. This study was conducted to compare simple surgical closure, secondary healing, and closure using a Limberg flap in the treatment of patients affected with pilonidal cysts. In total, 150 patients with pilonidal cysts were selected and randomized into 3 groups, with 50 participants in each group. Group A underwent primary closure, Group B underwent secondary closure, and Group C underwent closure with a Limberg flap. Operating time, amount of pain after surgery, time to mobilization, time until return to work, time for complete healing, time until being able to sit on the toilet without pain, postoperative complications including infection and recurrence, and seroma and edema after surgery were compared among the 3 groups. Duration of surgery in the Limberg flap group was significantly longer than the duration of surgery in Group A or Group B (p less then .001). The time to patient mobilization, the time when the patient returned to work, the time to complete healing, and the time to being able to sit on the toilet without pain were significantly shorter in Group C than in Group A or Group B (p less then .001). Although the procedure takes longer when using a Limberg flap, it appears to be a more effective method in the surgical treatment of patients with pilonidal cyst because of the reduced healing time and improved functional status after the procedure.In the United States, having limited access to health care has been an ongoing concern that could cause detrimental effects for minority populations, specifically the Hispanic population. Numerous barriers to accessing health care were identified for both pediatric and adult Hispanic patients who were born with craniofacial conditions. Barriers that were determined to impact Hispanic patients with craniofacial conditions from receiving medical and health services included language and communication, patient-health care provider relationships, socioeconomic status and finances, insurance status, timely access to appointments, citizenship and immigration status, and lack of family and social support. Interventions for these barriers were also proposed to increase support for Hispanic patients. Lamentably, there is scant research that investigates how these barriers affect this special population, despite the limitations that they have in their ability to access health care. In addition, these barriers to treatment have dire consequences for individuals with craniofacial conditions. The findings and proposed interventions discussed in this review article provide measures to minimize these barriers and define ways to benefit Hispanic patients with craniofacial conditions.Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy is a new approach in dermatology and there is evidence to suggest that it provides excellent adjuvant treatment for nonscarring alopecia cases. There is evidence supporting the hypothesis that PRP therapy increases hair growth and thickness in patients with nonscarring alopecia. Studies including participants with scarring alopecia are limited and larger scale studies with tighter controls in PRP preparation, administration, and follow-up are needed to determine whether this is a clinically sound approach. Further symptom control analysis is also warranted as in both single and combination PRP therapy trials there are little data to support treatment effect on symptoms such as burning and itching. In this article, the author explains PRP preparation processes and PRP types and compares stand-alone PRP therapy with combination PRP study results. selleck kinase inhibitor The author also makes recommendations for treatment and discusses the future of PRP research.