Daleduus4668

Z Iurium Wiki

Verze z 15. 11. 2024, 22:40, kterou vytvořil Daleduus4668 (diskuse | příspěvky) (Založena nová stránka s textem „Background The prevalence of neck pain is on the increase. A sedentary life style, poor ergonomics in the workplace and in daily life, and stress all contr…“)
(rozdíl) ← Starší verze | zobrazit aktuální verzi (rozdíl) | Novější verze → (rozdíl)

Background The prevalence of neck pain is on the increase. A sedentary life style, poor ergonomics in the workplace and in daily life, and stress all contribute to neck overload. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a single session of a Fascial Distortion Model (FDM) intervention combined with foam rolling in patients with cervical spine overload. Material and methods The study enrolled 90 patients, who were randomized to an FDM group, a foam rolling group (who exercised with a Duoball against a wall) and a control group, of 30 patients each. Mobility was measured with a digital inclinometer, pain intensity was assessed with a VAS scale and (upper and middle) trapezius tone was evaluated by sEMG. These measurements were carried out twice in each group and analysed in Matlab and Statistica 13. Results Both groups subjected to a therapeutic intervention (FDM and foam rolling) reported a significant reduction in neck pain intensity and improved cervical spine mobility (p less then 0.01). The control group did not demonstrate changes in mobility or pain intensity. The resting trapezius tone did not change in any of the groups. Conclusions, 1. A single session of FDM therapy can effectively reduce and eliminate cervical spine pain, which may be of use in work-site rehabilitation. 2. Single sessions of FDM and foam rolling can effectively improve neck mobility in patients with cervical spine overload. 3. https://www.selleckchem.com/ There is a rationale for conducting further prospective randomized studies of larger samples to assess the duration of the beneficial effects of both therapies and determine an optimum session frequency.Background Joshi's External Stabilization System (JESS) is an external fixator based methodology to correct different deformities of club foot using differential distraction. Material and methods 31 difficult clubfeet feet in 24 patients who were neglected, neurogenic or relapsed were treated using JESS between July 2013 to June 2015 with an average follow-up of 4. 2 years. There were 16 males and 8 females in an age group of 2-10 years. 30 feet belonged to the severe and most severe group as per the Dimeglio Scoring System. All patients achieved correction of all components of the clubfoot. Results However, one patient required tibialis anterior transfer for dynamic forefoot adduction at the end of treatment. The mean total duration in JESS fixation was 69.5 days/foot (range 44-123 days) and the mean time to achieve correction within JESS averaged 52 days. The deformities improved from a mean Dimeglio score of 14.06 to 2.93. The objective radiological assessment of the deformities revealed improvements in the talocalcaneal angle on AP view from 16.39° to 34.52° and on lateral view from 15.97° to 33.03°. The Talo-1st metatarsal angle (AP view) improved from 35.29° to 7°. Complications included 11 cases of superficial pin tract infection, two instances of pin loosening and a case of pin cut out. There were three cases of 1st metatarsophalangeal dislocation that were managed by reversing the process of distraction. Conclusion JESS is an effective method for managing difficult clubfeet.Background Elastic intramedullary nails (ESIN) have been the treatment of choice in many long bone fractures in children for more than 20 years. The introduction of ESIN has drastically reduced tissue traumatization during fracture fixation procedures and decreased the risk of growth cartilage damage, as well as allowing for preservation of the natural biology of closed fracture healing. The objective of the present report is to draw attention to a small group of patients with bone mineralization disorders, who consequently demonstrate decreased mechanical resistance of the skeletal system, in whom indications for using ESIN fixation are limited. Material and methods The study group consisted of 6 patients who met the criteria for using ESIN fixation, but did not demonstrate a satisfactory outcome. The inclusion criteria included age below 18 years, appropriate ESIN nail insertion technique with correct calculation of nail diameter (2/5 of the medullary canal diameter), body mass less then 50 kg and achieving appropriate prebending that is the prerequisite of three-point intramedullary support. The patients' medical records and radiographs were analyzed and they were invited for clinical and radiological follow-up examinations. Results All six patients demonstrated a gradually increasing bending deformity of the long bone axis. Additionally, in three patients, there was intrusion of terminal parts of the nails into the bone. In one patient with bone fibrous dysplasia, the proximal epiphysis was perforated by the flattened ends of the nails. In all patients, the removal of the ESIN fixation was followed by single or double-level corrective osteotomies and Rush pin fixation. Conclusion In cases of long bone fractures in children with metabolic bone disorders in whom the bone structure is weakened and the bones themselves are easily deformed, more rigid intramedullary fixation with Rush or Fassier-Duval type nails as primary osteosynthesis should be considered.Background There is limited evidence about the effectiveness of rehabilitation in meeting the longer-term needs of stroke patients and their carers. Objective To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an extended stroke rehabilitation service (EXTRAS). Design A pragmatic, observer-blind, parallel-group, multicentre randomised controlled trial with embedded health economic and process evaluations. Participants were randomised (1 1) to receive EXTRAS or usual care. Setting Nineteen NHS study centres. Participants Patients with a new stroke who received early supported discharge and their informal carers. Interventions Five EXTRAS reviews provided by an early supported discharge team member between 1 and 18 months post early supported discharge, usually over the telephone. Reviewers assessed rehabilitation needs, with goal-setting and action-planning. Control treatment was usual care post early supported discharge. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was performance in extended activities of daily living (Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale) at 24 months post randomisation.

Autoři článku: Daleduus4668 (Hassan Weeks)