Hornbrun1764

Z Iurium Wiki

Verze z 15. 11. 2024, 13:19, kterou vytvořil Hornbrun1764 (diskuse | příspěvky) (Založena nová stránka s textem „The precondition of the measurement of longitudinal learning is a high-quality instrument for longitudinal learning diagnosis. This study developed an inst…“)
(rozdíl) ← Starší verze | zobrazit aktuální verzi (rozdíl) | Novější verze → (rozdíl)

The precondition of the measurement of longitudinal learning is a high-quality instrument for longitudinal learning diagnosis. This study developed an instrument for longitudinal learning diagnosis of rational number operations. In order to provide a reference for practitioners to develop the instrument for longitudinal learning diagnosis, the development process was presented step by step. The development process contains three main phases, the Q-matrix construction and item development, the preliminary/pilot test for item quality monitoring, and the formal test for test quality control. The results of this study indicate that (a) both the overall quality of the tests and the quality of each item are good enough and that (b) the three tests meet the requirements of parallel tests, which can be used as an instrument for longitudinal learning diagnosis to track students' learning.Ingratiation is regarded as a powerful impression tactic that helps ingratiator achieve their intended goals. Although there is evidence that the consequences of ingratiation are not always positive, little research considers the dark effect of ingratiation on the ingratiator. Based on conservation of resources theory, we develop and test a model that links employees' ingratiation to their counterproductive work behaviors. Data were collected from 216 supervisor-employee dyads. The results of examination with Mplus showed that ingratiation had a positive effect on counterproductive work behaviors, and emotional exhaustion played a mediating role in this relationship. Power distance orientation negatively moderated the relationship between ingratiation and emotional exhaustion and the indirect effect of emotional exhaustion on the relationship between ingratiation and counterproductive work behaviors. Our findings raise attention on the consequences of ingratiation for employees and the dark side of ingratiation for organization.The Iowa gambling task (IGT) is an instrument for the neuropsychological evaluation of cognitive and emotional decision making (DM) processes that was created to test the somatic marker hypothesis (SMH) described by Damasio in 1994. It was initially applied to patients with frontal lobe lesions due to its association with executive functions but was subsequently used on patients with a variety of disorders. Although the DM process is inherently perceptual, few studies have applied the IGT to examine DM processes in patients with eating disorders (EDs), and even fewer have associated the IGT to the perceptual distortion of body image (PDBI) in this population. #link# People diagnosed with ED exhibit heightened control over their somatic responses-for example, they can delay digestion for hours-and DM may be affected in this condition. This study compares the performance of two samples of adolescent women-hospitalized patients with ED, and healthy controls with similar demographic characteristics-on the IGT using bodydisadvantageous or riskier decisions were made by the subjects with more distortion.The three studies presented here examine children's ability to make diagnostic inferences about an interactive causal structure across different domains. Previous work has shown that children's abilities to make diagnostic inferences about a physical system develops between the ages of 5 and 8. Experiments 1 (N = 242) and 2 (N = 112) replicate this work with 4- to 10-year-olds and demonstrate that this developmental trajectory is preserved when children reason about a closely matched biological system. Unlike Experiments 1 and 2, Experiment 3 (N = 110) demonstrates that children struggle to make similar inferences when presented with a parallel task about category membership in biology. These results suggest that children might have the basic capacity for diagnostic inference at relatively early ages, but that the content of the inference task might interfere with their ability to demonstrate such capacities.

To investigate how changes in the levels of preparedness and experiences of death and dying influence nursing students' mental health.

The COVID-19 pandemic is likely to cause significant trauma in the nursing population. The lack of preparation, in combination with a substantial loss of life, may have implications for the longer-term mental health of the nursing workforce. Nursing PROTAC chemical have, in many cases, been an important part of the emergency response.

A longitudinal cohort study was conducted in the academic year 2014/15 with data collected at two time points. There was a 7-month time period between data collection.

Participants completed paper-based questionnaires measuring demographics, academic stressors, clinical stressors, and mental health. 358 nursing students at time point one and 347 at time point two (97% retention) completed the survey.

Inadequate preparation (OR 1.783) and the inadequate preparation x death and dying interaction term (OR 4.115) significantly increased risk of mental health problems over time. Increased death and dying alone did not increase mental health risk.

The results of this study suggest that it is not the increase in death and dying

that causes mental health difficulties, but that it is instead the experience of high levels of death and dying in combination with inadequate preparation. The data are considered within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, with both inadequate preparation and the scale of death and dying being two significant stressors during the emergency period.

The results of this study suggest that it is not the increase in death and dying per se that causes mental health difficulties, but that it is instead the experience of high levels of death and dying in combination with inadequate preparation. The data are considered within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, with both inadequate preparation and the scale of death and dying being two significant stressors during the emergency period.Contemporary teams often face complex problem-solving tasks. We theorized that two individual differences previously neglected in team research (cognitive motivation and maximizing) would be helpful for teams facing such situations. We tested this assertion on 81 teams participating in an escape-room simulation in which teams were locked into a pre-arranged room and had to solve various complex problems to escape the room as quickly as possible. The findings show that the average of the team members' cognitive motivation had a positive direct relation to team performance, while maximizing had a positive indirect relation to team performance via cooperation.

Autoři článku: Hornbrun1764 (Haagensen Roach)