Jantzenneumann3208

tissue, and PSMA-derived tumor burden is associated with severity of disease.OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to assess postoperative biochemical failure in patients with prostate cancer according to zonal location of an index lesion classified as Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) category 4 or 5. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Consecutive patients (n = 232) with prostate cancer who had PI-RADSv2 category 4 or 5 lesions on MRI and who underwent radical prostatectomy were retrospectively evaluated. We investigated clinical (prostate-specific antigen density), MRI (PI-RADSv2 category of index lesion and zonal location, assessed as peripheral zone [PZ] or transition zone [TZ], of index lesion), and pathologic (tumor volume, tumor grade, and presence of extraprostatic extension) parameters. We analyzed Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the Cox proportional hazards model to assess 2-year biochemical failure-free survival and identify significant parameters associated with postoperative biochemical failure RESULTS. Biochemical failure occurred in 14.2% of patients (33/232). Two-year biochemical failure-free survival of patients with a PI-RADSv2 category 4 or 5 index lesion was 81.3%. For all patients, 2-year biochemical failure-free survival was different according to PI-RADSv2 category (category 4, 86.4%; category 5, 74.5%; p = 0.021) or zonal location (PZ, 75.3%; TZ, 96.8%; p = 0.003). Two-year biochemical failure-free survival in patients with category 4 lesions was similar in patients with PZ lesions (83.1%) and those with TZ lesions (100.0%) (p = 0.072), whereas it was different in patients with category 5 lesions (PZ, 62.0%; TZ, 95.0%; p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, only zonal location of an index lesion on MRI was associated with biochemical failure (hazard ratio = 0.155; p = 0.012). CONCLUSION. Zonal location of an index lesion on MRI may be a useful imaging bio-marker to predict postoperative biochemical failure.OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate of detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), as assessed on the basis of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADSv2.1) guidelines, using 3-T in-bore MR-guided biopsy (MRGB) for a cohort of patients suspected of having csPCa despite having a history of recent negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy results. selleck MATERIALS AND METHODS. The cohort in this retrospective, single-center study was derived from a database of 330 patients who underwent multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) followed by in-bore transrectal 3-T MRGB. Seventy-nine patients (mean [± SD] age, 64.1 ± 8.6 years) with prior negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy results and positive pre-MRGB mpMRI results (PI-RADS score ≥ 3) composed the final cohort. The rate of detection of PCa and csPCa (the latter of which was defined by a Gleason score of 3 + 4 or higher) was stratified according to updated PI-RADSv2.1 assessment. RESULTS. MRGB detected Pgreater than or equal to 0.10 ng/mL/cc may benefit from in-bore MRGB.OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the experience of radiologists who include contact information in radiology reports in an era of open access to reports via patient portals. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. A prospective nonrandomized survey of all 61 radiologists in a single private practice group was conducted between July and August 2019. The survey, which consisted of 21 questions, was administered via a secure online survey software platform and distributed by e-mail. Participation was voluntary and anonymous. Data were analyzed using statistical analysis software. RESULTS. A total of 87% (53 of 61) of the radiologists completed the survey. Of these radiologists, 78% (41 of 52) indicated that they include their telephone number in radiology reports 75% or more of the time, with one radiologist not providing a response. Thirty-six percent of the radiologists are contacted once a year by patients, and 27% are contacted once a month. Of the 41 radiologists who include contact information 75% of the time or more, most (56% [23 of 41]) reported an increase in the frequency of patient contact. The reasons why radiologists had a patient contact them were to better understand the radiology report (95% of radiologists), to seek follow-up recommendations (39%), to express gratitude (34%), and to point out mistakes in the report (27%). Moreover, 98% (40 of 41) of radiologists reported never receiving complaints from a referring physician. Only 2% of radiologists stated that patient interaction was detrimental to workflow. Most radiologists found that interacting with patients was a satisfying experience and indicated that they would welcome more patient interaction. CONCLUSION. Including radiologist contact information in radiology reports increases patient-radiologist interaction. Despite this increased patient interaction, most radiologists indicated that they would welcome more interaction and found the communication satisfying.BACKGROUND. Anesthetic exposure in children may impact long-term neurocognitive outcomes. Therefore, minimizing pediatric MRI scan time in children under anesthesia and the associated anesthetic exposure is necessary. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate pediatric MRI scan time as a predictor of total propofol dose, considering imaging and clinical characteristics as covariates. METHODS. Electronic health records were retrospectively searched to identify MRI examinations performed from 2016 to 2019 in patients 0-18 years old who received propofol anesthetic. Brain; brain and spine; brain and abdomen; and brain, head, and neck MRI examinations were included. Demographic, clinical, and imaging data were extracted for each examination, including anesthesia maintenance phase time, MRI scan time, and normalized propofol dose. MRI scan time and propofol dose were compared between groups using a t test. A multiple linear regression with backward selection (threshold, p less then .05) was used to evhen .001), multiple body part examination (p = .04), and IV contrast medium administration (p = .048); lower exposure was predicted by 3-T magnet (p = .04). CONCLUSION. Anesthetic exposure during pediatric MRI can be quantified and predicted based on imaging and clinical variables. CLINICAL IMPACT. This study serves as a valuable baseline for future efforts to reduce anesthetic doses and scan times in pediatric MRI.