Hortonhave1492

Z Iurium Wiki

Verze z 13. 11. 2024, 14:12, kterou vytvořil Hortonhave1492 (diskuse | příspěvky) (Založena nová stránka s textem „To conduct a bibliometric analysis that systematically characterizes publications on temporomandibular joint temporomandibular joint replacement from 1986…“)
(rozdíl) ← Starší verze | zobrazit aktuální verzi (rozdíl) | Novější verze → (rozdíl)

To conduct a bibliometric analysis that systematically characterizes publications on temporomandibular joint temporomandibular joint replacement from 1986 to2020.

The articles were retrieved on the same day from the Web of Science Core Collection database of the Web of Science on December 31, 2020 to prevent bias due to daily database updates. Excel 2016, CiteSpace IV, and VOSviewer v1.6.16 were used for analysis.

A sum of 610 publications from 1986 to 2020 were analyzed. The highest number of publications were identified and published in the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. The United States had the highest number of publications and the highest H-index. The highest co-citations were from Mercuri.

In this study, developments, the most influential publications, journals, and countries in the field of temporomandibular joint temporomandibular joint replacement were determined based on evidence through bibliometric analysis.

In this study, developments, the most influential publications, journals, and countries in the field of temporomandibular joint temporomandibular joint replacement were determined based on evidence through bibliometric analysis.

Blogs are being used increasingly to disseminate nutrition information to consumers, including by registered dietitians (RDs). read more Guidelines in authoring blogs are important for dietetics professionals so that they effectively communicate evidence-based nutrition information in this format.

The aim of this study was to obtain consensus from experts comprising RDs with active blog-writing experience on a set of guidelines for use by RDs when authoring a healthy eating or nutrition information blog.

A modified e-Delphi technique with a consensus-based approach was used in this study undertaken between June and October 2019. The purpose-built, pilot-tested e-Delphi survey was informed by a literature review and included statements from 3 domains comprising blog readers and communication; purpose and healthy eating messages; and structure, voice, and tone. Expert participants were identified purposively and via snowballing. In each survey round, statements that achieved 80% consensus were accepted.

A total of 19 experts consented to participate. Experts resided in the United States, Australia, and United Kingdom. Experts were mainly women aged between 30 and 49 years and working in private practice and/or research or teaching areas of nutrition and dietetics.

Across 3 domains, a total of 33 statements were accepted, comprising a final set of guidelines named the P.O.S.T (purpose, community, structure, and tone) Guidelines for Nutrition Blogs.

Consensus from a panel of dietetics experts resulted in the P.O.S.T Guidelines for Nutrition Blogs, which can support RDs in authoring healthy eating blogs. This will ensure that evidence-based nutrition messages provided to consumers are engaging and effective.

Consensus from a panel of dietetics experts resulted in the P.O.S.T Guidelines for Nutrition Blogs, which can support RDs in authoring healthy eating blogs. This will ensure that evidence-based nutrition messages provided to consumers are engaging and effective.Noninferiority trials are increasingly used in urology. Understanding the methodology and assessment of such trials can be challenging for clinicians. We provide an approach to interpreting the results, validity, and applicability of noninferiority studies in clinical practice.Radiofrequency ablation is commonly performed in the management of incessant ventricular tachycardias. Pre-procedural planning using different imaging modalities including cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance plays an integral role in understanding the anatomy and potential origin of the arrhythmias to guide successful targeted ablation.

To compare 10-year clinical outcomes of frozen versus fresh corneal graft carriers for the Boston Keratoprosthesis type 1 (KPro).

Prospective, non-masked randomized controlled trial.

Nineteen eyes of 19 patients having undergone Boston KPro type 1 implantation using a fresh or frozen graft carrier.

All patients that underwent Boston KPro type 1 implantation by a single experienced surgeon using an allograft carrier between October 2008 and March 2010 at the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal were considered. Patients were excluded if they had a history of prior KPro implantation in the same eye. A subset of the patient cohort enrolled in the initial study protocol of 24 months continued follow-up to 120 months. Participants were randomized to receive either a fresh or frozen corneal graft carrier depending on tissue availability from the eye bank on the day of KPro implantation.

Nineteen eyes of 19 patients were included, with 11 in the fresh group and 8 in the frozen group. At 10 years, in the fresh and frozen groups respectively, device retention was 91% and 75%; mean best corrected visual acuity increased from counting fingers preoperatively to 20/300 and 20/125; and incidence of complications per patient was 2.36 and 2.37. There were no statistically significant differences between groups for any of these outcome measures (p > 0.05 for all analyses).

Fresh and frozen corneal graft carriers offer similar clinical outcomes for KPro implantation in terms of device retention, change in visual acuity, and rate of complications at 10 years.

Fresh and frozen corneal graft carriers offer similar clinical outcomes for KPro implantation in terms of device retention, change in visual acuity, and rate of complications at 10 years.

This study was conducted to analyse emergency ophthalmology referrals to a Canadian tertiary academic centre during the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in comparison to prepandemic referrals.

This was a retrospective chart review looking at emergency referrals seen by the ophthalmology service between March 18 to April 17, 2020 (representing the COVID-19 period), and March 18 to April 17, 2019 (representing the pre-COVID-19 period).

Data gathered from referral records included patient demographics, timing and site of referral, and ophthalmic diagnosis. Referrals were categorized as urgent or nonurgent, with urgent indicating the need for ophthalmic assessment within 24 hours.

The total number of referrals decreased by 54.2% in the COVID-19 period versus the pre-COVID-19 period. There was a similar bimodal age distribution in both periods, with fewer patients over 65 years of age presenting during the pandemic. Tertiary hospital referrals decreased by 62% in the pandemic period, while nontertiary emergency department referral trends varied and outpatient clinic referrals increased by 16%.

Autoři článku: Hortonhave1492 (Schack Dudley)