Skovdaley6792

Forty-seven patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis or recurrent Ewing sarcoma (EWS) received high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) followed by tandem (n = 20, from February 13, 1997, to October 24, 2002) or single (n = 27, from October 1, 2004, to September 5, 2018) autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). To our knowledge, this is the largest single-institution study with sustained long-term follow-up exceeding 10 years. All patients who underwent single ASCT received a novel conditioning regimen with busulfan, melphalan, and topotecan. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 46% and 37% at 10 years and 42% and 37% at 15 years, respectively. Disease status at transplant and the time to disease relapse prior to ASCT were identified as important prognostic factors in OS, DFS, and risk of relapse. At 10 years, patients who underwent transplantation in first complete response (1CR) had an excellent outcome (OS 78%), patients in 1CR/second complete response (2CR)/first partial response (1PR) had an OS of 66%, and patients at third or more complete response, second or more partial response, or advanced disease had an OS of 26%. Ten-year OS for patients without a history of relapse, with late relapse (≥2 years from diagnosis), or with early relapse ( less then 2 years from diagnosis) was 75%, 50%, and 18%, respectively. Selected patients in 1CR, 2CR, 1PR, and with late relapse had excellent, sustained 10- and 15-year OS and DFS.A multicenter retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the clinical significance of preconditioning intervention (PCI) before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) not in remission. The study cohort consisted of 519 patients classified according to the intensity (intensive/moderate) of PCI and their response to PCI. #link# The group treated with PCI had higher blast counts in the peripheral blood (PB) and had a lower overall survival (OS) rate (P less then .001) and higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rate (P = .035) compared with those without PCI (no PCI group). Approximately 40% of the patients (68 of 236) achieved a good response to PCI (good PCI group), and those patients had lower blast counts in the PB compared with the group with poor response to PCI (poor PCI group). OS in the good PCI group was comparable to that in the no PCI group and significantly better than that in the poor PCI group (hazard ratio, .54; 95% confidence interval, .39 to .77; P less then .001). However, OS was significantly lower in patients with intensive/moderate PCI compared with the no PCI group. These results suggest that PCI increases NRM without decreasing the post-transplantation relapse rate, but may be beneficial for patients with lower blast counts in PB irrespective of its intensity.Craniofacial fractures management is challenging to teach due to the complex anatomy of the head, even when using three-dimensional CT-scan images. DIVA is a software allowing the straightforward visualization of CT-scans in a user-friendly three-dimensional virtual reality environment. Here, we assess DIVA as an educational tool for craniofacial trauma for undergraduate medical students. Three craniofacial trauma cases (jaw fracture, naso-orbital-ethmoid complex fracture and Le Fort 3 fracture) were submitted to 50 undergraduate medical students, who had to provide diagnoses and treatment plans. Each student then filled an 8-item questionnaire assessing satisfaction, potential benefit, ease of use and tolerance. Additionally, 4 postgraduate students were requested to explore these cases and to place 6 anatomical landmarks on both virtual reality renderings and usual slice-based three-dimensional CT-scan visualizations. High degrees of satisfaction (98%) without specific tolerance issues (86%) were reported. The potential benefit in a better understanding of craniofacial trauma using virtual reality was reported by almost all students (98%). Virtual reality allowed a reliable localization of key anatomical landmarks when compared with standard three-dimensional CT-scan visualization. Virtual reality interfaces such DIVA are beneficial to medical students for a better understanding of craniofacial trauma and allow a reliable rendering of craniofacial anatomy.

Compare bone density changes and initial implant stability following sinus augmentation with autogenous bone (AB) vs. fresh frozen bone (FFB).

Randomized, prospective, split mouth study. Sinus augmentation executed using either AB or FFB. Dental implants were inserted after 6 months of healing. Implant dimensions and insertion torques were recorded. Prostheses were delivered 6 months thereafter. All patients had computerized tomography (CT) scans 1 week (T1) and 6 months (T2) after initial bone grafting. Third CT (T3) was taken 12 months after prosthesis delivery. Data from CT scans was used to analyze bone density at each period.

A total of 15 patients (8 males, 7 females) following bilateral sinus augmentation procedures, were included. Mean age was 54 ± 5 years (range 48-60 years). All patients had 3 CT examinations. The initial augmented AB density was higher than the initial FFB density. Nevertheless, density differences between the two groups were not statistically significant at any time frame. At T2 density of both grafts showed a statistically significant increase. A significant increase from T2 to T3 was noted only for the FFB group. Implant insertion torque was significantly higher in the FFB group. Insertion torque ≥32 N/cm was achieved in significantly more patients in the FFB group.

The use of FFB for sinus augmentation is a reliable option of graft material. The newly formed bone quality performance, evaluated by CBCT density, is as good as AB, allowing predictable initial implant stability and osseointegration. Unnecessary morbidity associated with AB harvesting is thus avoided.

The use of FFB for sinus augmentation is a reliable option of graft material. selleck compound formed bone quality performance, evaluated by CBCT density, is as good as AB, allowing predictable initial implant stability and osseointegration. Unnecessary morbidity associated with AB harvesting is thus avoided.