Deanhaney3794
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of vaccination decision aids compared with usual care on vaccine uptake, vaccine attitudes, decisional conflict, intent to vaccinate and timeliness.
Searches were conducted in OVID Medline, OVID Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library and SCOPUS. selleck products Randomised controlled trials were included if they evaluated the impact of decision aids as defined by the International Patient Decision Aids Standards Collaboration. Where possible, meta-analysis was undertaken. Where meta-analysis was not possible, we conducted a narrative synthesis. Risk of bias in included trials was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Data were analysed using STATA.
Five RCTs were identified that evaluated the effectiveness of decision aids in the context of vaccination decision making. Meta-analysis of four studies showed that decision aids may have slightly increased vaccination uptake, but this was reduced to no effect once stud of the effectiveness of different elements and formats. Standardising decision aids would also allow for easier comparison between decision aids.This study aims to investigate the feasibility of quantitative ultrasonic backscatter in evaluating human cortical and trabecular bone densities in vivo based on a head-down-tilt bed rest study, with 36 participants tested through 90 d of bed rest and 180 d of recovery. Backscatter measurements were performed using an ultrasonic backscatter bone diagnostic instrument. Backscatter parameters were calculated with a dynamic signal-of-interest method, which was proposed to ensure the same ultrasonic interrogated volume in cortical and trabecular bones. The backscatter parameters exhibited significant correlations with site-matched bone densities provided by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (0.33 less then |R| less then 0.72, p less then 0.05). Some bone densities and backscatter parameters exhibited significant changes after the 90-d bed rest. The proposed method can be used to characterize bone densities, and the portable ultrasonic backscatter bone diagnostic device might be used to non-invasively reveal mean bone loss (across a group of people) after long-term bed rest and microgravity conditions of spaceflight missions.This study investigated the usefulness of conventional ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in distinguishing metastasis of pelvic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with gynecological cancer. We examined 74 SLNs of patients with endometrial cancer (n = 26) and cervical cancer (n = 11). Patients underwent US and CEUS followed by SLN biopsy; US and CEUS results were evaluated visually and quantitatively and compared between pathological metastasis-negative and -positive groups. To support CEUS results, the microvessel density of SLNs was evaluated immunohistochemically. Seventeen positive and 40 negative SLNs were evaluable. Margin and enhancement patterns by visual assessment revealed significant differences (p = 0.046 and 0.022, respectively). In quantitative time-intensity curve analyses, the weakest peak intensities (PImin), PI ratio and PI difference indicated significant differences (p = 0.045, p less then 0.001 and p less then 0.001, respectively). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were 0.64, 0.82 and 0.83, respectively. The most effective PI ratio from the AUC was 1.3 (sensitivity = 82%, specificity = 70%), and the PI difference from the AUC was 20 (sensitivity = 88%, specificity = 70%). Microvessel density was significantly lower in metastatic lesions than in other areas. The quantitative analysis of CEUS seemed to be a reasonable method for distinguishing lymph node metastasis in patients with gynecological cancer.The World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) is addressing the issue of incidental findings (IFs) with a series of publications entitled "Incidental Imaging Findings-The Role of Medical Ultrasound." IFs are less commonly encountered in the spleen than in many other abdominal organs but remain a frequent dilemma in clinical practice. A histological diagnosis is rarely necessary for patient management. Many IFs, such as secondary spleens and splenic cysts, are harmless and do not require any further investigation. The diagnosis of many other focal splenic lesions is, however, often problematic. The following overview is intended to illustrate a variety of incidentally detected spleen pathologies such as size variants, shape variants, secondary spleens, focal splenic lesions and splenic calcifications. It should aid the examiner in establishing the diagnosis. Moreover, it should help the ultrasound practitioner decide which pathologies need no further investigation, those requiring interval imaging and cases in which immediate further diagnostic procedures are required.Asthma is the most common chronic condition in pregnant women. The risks of complications associated with asthma for the mother, the foetus and the pregnancy are mainly due to uncontrolled asthma and the occurrence of exacerbations. These events are promoted by the patient's difficulty in complying with treatment or by prescription insufficiency for an unjustified fear of teratogenicity. The challenge of the management of asthma during pregnancy is to ensure optimal maternal asthma control in order to prevent foetal hypoxia and thus, reduce the risk of complications. Preventing the occurrence of asthma symptoms and exacerbations, ensuring optimal lung function and managing the risk factors of poor asthma outcomes and comorbidities are the principles necessary to achieve this goal. Because of the low or non-existent risks of the main treatments of asthma for the foetus and the mother, it is widely recommended that all therapies initiated before conception are continued, in particular inhaled corticosteroids, and to adjust the dosage to the minimum effective dose. During the preconception period and throughout pregnancy, coordination of the different healthcare professionals (general practitioner, respiratory specialist and gynecologist) is essential, with the mother-to-be playing a central role in the management of her asthma.