Hegelundzachariassen0240
The analysis revealed a shorter surgery duration in the device group (23min, after controlling for procedure year and patient characteristics; statistically significant at p < 0.001) and lower complication and readmission rates (p = 0.67 and p = 0.21, respectively) associated with the use of the device, leading to a statistically significant cost reduction of approximately 2060 US dollars (US$) (p < 0.01).
The study suggests that use of the device may lead to a cost reduction and shorter procedure without deteriorating the clinical outcome.
The study suggests that use of the device may lead to a cost reduction and shorter procedure without deteriorating the clinical outcome.
Many patients seek breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Debate exists regarding the best reconstructive option. The authors evaluate outcomes comparing implant, free flap, and pedicled flap reconstruction.
Patients undergoing implant, pedicled flap, and free flap reconstruction were identified in the 2011-2016 NSQIP database. Demographics were analyzed and covariates were balanced using overlap propensity score. Logistic regression was used for binary outcomes and Gamma GLM for length of stay (LOS).
Of 23,834 patients, 87.7% underwent implant, 8.1% free flap, and 4.2% pedicled flap reconstruction. The implant group had the lowest mean operative time (206min, SD 85.6). Implant patients had less pneumonia (OR 0.09, CI 0.02-0.36, p < 0.01), return to operating room (OR 0.62, CI 0.50-0.75, p < 0.01), venous thromboembolism (VTE) (OR 0.33, CI 0.14-0.79, p = 0.01), postoperative bleeding (OR 0.10, CI 0.06-0.15, p < 0.01), and urinary tract infections (UTI) (OR 0.21, CI 0.07-0.58, p < 0.01) than free flap patients. Pedicled flap patients had less postoperative bleeding (OR 0.69, CI 0.49-0.96, p = 0.03) than free flap patients. Pedicled flap patients had more superficial surgical site infections (p = 0.03), pneumonia (p = 0.02), postoperative bleeding (p < 0.01), VTE (p = 0.04), sepsis (p = 0.05), and unplanned reintubation (p = 0.01) than implant patients. Implant patients had the lowest LOS (1.6days, p < 0.01).
Implant reconstruction has less short-term postoperative complications than free flaps and pedicled flap reconstructions. The overall complication rate among all reconstructive modalities remains acceptably low and patients should be informed of all surgical options.
Implant reconstruction has less short-term postoperative complications than free flaps and pedicled flap reconstructions. The overall complication rate among all reconstructive modalities remains acceptably low and patients should be informed of all surgical options.
Oral phase dysphagia is dependent on ability to chew. As people age, general muscle atrophy contributes to decreased masseter strength. The main objective of this study was to assess the relationship between the thickness of the masseter muscle measured by ultrasonography and the presence of dysphagia in a group of institutionalized elderly people. As a secondary objective, we aimed to establish cutoff points of masseters muscle thickness (MMT) to identify elderly individuals at risk of oral dysphagia.
Cross-sectional study of all residents from 3 nursing homes. All individuals underwent ultrasonographic measurements of left and right MMT and were classified according to the presence of dysphagia assessed by both the EAT-10 screening questionnaire and the volume-viscosity swallow test (V-VST).
469 patients (69% women, mean age 84.7yrs) were recruited. Dysphagia was present in 41.6% and 26% of individuals according the EAT-10 and V-VST, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression showed that 1mm increase in MMT reduced the risk of dysphagia by 21% according to the EAT-10 tool and by 30% using the V-VST after adjusting for age, sex, mini-nutritional assessment score, and body mass index. We used receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curves to identify cutoff points of MMT to detect dysphagic individuals according to either EAT-10 or V-VST.
The MMT measured by ultrasonography is reduced in elderly individuals with dysphagia. compound 3k Based on MMT, clinicians may be better informed about the patients'´ ability to masticate solid foods and identify potential nutrient deficiencies in geriatric settings.
The MMT measured by ultrasonography is reduced in elderly individuals with dysphagia. Based on MMT, clinicians may be better informed about the patients'´ ability to masticate solid foods and identify potential nutrient deficiencies in geriatric settings.
The role of artificial and bioartificial liver support systems in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is still controversial. We aimed to perform the first network meta-analysis comparing and ranking different liver support systems and standard medical therapy (SMT) in patients with ACLF.
The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020155850). A systematic search was conducted in five databases. We conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of artificial or bioartificial liver support systems on survival in patients with ACLF. Ranking was performed by calculating the surface under cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve values. The RoB2 tool and a modified GRADE approach were used for the assessment of the risk of bias and quality of evidence (QE).
In the quantitative synthesis 16 trials were included, using MARS®, Prometheus®, ELAD®, plasma exchange (PE) and BioLogic-DT®. Overall (OS) and transplant-free (TFS) survival were assessed at 1 and 3months. PE significantly improved 3-month OS compared to SMT (RR 0.74, CrI 0.6-0.94) and ranked first on the cumulative ranking curves for both OS outcomes (SUCRA 86% at 3months; 77% at 1month) and 3-month TFS (SUCRA 87%) and second after ELAD for 1-month TFS (SUCRA 76%). Other comparisons did not reach statistical significance. QE was moderate for PE concerning 1-month OS and both TFS outcomes. Other results were of very low certainty.
PE seems to be the best currently available liver support therapy in ACLF regarding 3-month OS. Based on the low QE, randomized trials are needed to confirm our findings for already existing options and to introduce new devices.
PE seems to be the best currently available liver support therapy in ACLF regarding 3-month OS. Based on the low QE, randomized trials are needed to confirm our findings for already existing options and to introduce new devices.