Contrerashu4382

Z Iurium Wiki

Verze z 24. 10. 2024, 13:37, kterou vytvořil Contrerashu4382 (diskuse | příspěvky) (Založena nová stránka s textem „The main approach used for its surgical removal is the intraoral one, but there are cases in which this may not be the best option. When the lower third mo…“)
(rozdíl) ← Starší verze | zobrazit aktuální verzi (rozdíl) | Novější verze → (rozdíl)

The main approach used for its surgical removal is the intraoral one, but there are cases in which this may not be the best option. When the lower third molar is located below the lower alveolar canal or when it is close to the lower edge of the jaw, the most recommended approach is the extraoral one. The critical issues related to the extraoral approach are the possibility of damaging anatomical structures such as marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve (craniofacial nerve VII), facial artery and vein, and submental artery. Picropodophyllin nmr This complication can occur during incision and dissection of the superficial layers or during osteotomy with rotating instruments.This paper reports a case of extraction of ectopic lower third molar using a minimally invasive extraoral approach combined with piezoelectric surgery in order to prevent intraoperative injury of anatomical structures.

Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after cleft palate repair remains an intriguing problem for the cleft surgeon. While other options for the treatment of VPI, in many ways the sphincter pharyngoplasty has become a reliable and satisfying operation. When the applied to the properly selected patient, it rearranges the palatopharyngeus muscles to provide dynamic closure of the newly created central velopharngeal port. The dynamic action is particularly satisfying to the surgeon. The surgery evolved in part because of the dedication and creativity of Dr Ian Jackson who's description is closest to the design used today. In his memory we felt it fitting to review Dr Jackson's involvement with the surgery over the decades as well as include our own thoughts on the advantages of the procedure.

Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after cleft palate repair remains an intriguing problem for the cleft surgeon. While other options for the treatment of VPI, in many ways the sphincter pharyngoplasty has become a reliable and satisfying operation. When the applied to the properly selected patient, it rearranges the palatopharyngeus muscles to provide dynamic closure of the newly created central velopharngeal port. The dynamic action is particularly satisfying to the surgeon. The surgery evolved in part because of the dedication and creativity of Dr Ian Jackson who's description is closest to the design used today. In his memory we felt it fitting to review Dr Jackson's involvement with the surgery over the decades as well as include our own thoughts on the advantages of the procedure.

A nasal septal perforation is a defect of cartilage, bone, or mucosa of nasal septum, which is caused by previous septal surgery, trauma, chemicals, inflammatory disease, or drugs. If conservative managements, such as nasal saline irrigation or ointments, are not effective, surgical treatment can be considered. Various methods for the reconstruction of nasal septal perforation were reported, such as local flaps, free flaps, autografts, allografts, or xenografts. However, there is no standardized method due to low success rate and high recurrence rate, especially in large perforations. The authors report a successful repair case of large anteroinferior nasal septal perforation, using inferior based contralateral nasal floor flap. The authors believe that our method is an effective way to repair large nasal septal perforation and to minimalize donor site morbidity, without using other allografts.

A nasal septal perforation is a defect of cartilage, bone, or mucosa of nasal septum, which is caused by previous septal surgery, trauma, chemicals, inflammatory disease, or drugs. If conservative managements, such as nasal saline irrigation or ointments, are not effective, surgical treatment can be considered. Various methods for the reconstruction of nasal septal perforation were reported, such as local flaps, free flaps, autografts, allografts, or xenografts. However, there is no standardized method due to low success rate and high recurrence rate, especially in large perforations. The authors report a successful repair case of large anteroinferior nasal septal perforation, using inferior based contralateral nasal floor flap. The authors believe that our method is an effective way to repair large nasal septal perforation and to minimalize donor site morbidity, without using other allografts.

Mandibular condyle osteochondromas cause morphologic and functional disturbances. Multiple options exist for reconstructing the condylar segment following complete condylectomy. In this series, we describe 3 cases of mandibular condyle osteochondroma treated with complete condylectomy, orthognathic surgery, and a novel free ramus osteotomy graft. This is the first report to reconstruct the temporomandibular joint using a free ramus graft. Through this single-staged approach we were able to avoid recurrence, preserve function, and restore facial balance without a separate donor site or an alloplastic implant.

Mandibular condyle osteochondromas cause morphologic and functional disturbances. Multiple options exist for reconstructing the condylar segment following complete condylectomy. In this series, we describe 3 cases of mandibular condyle osteochondroma treated with complete condylectomy, orthognathic surgery, and a novel free ramus osteotomy graft. This is the first report to reconstruct the temporomandibular joint using a free ramus graft. Through this single-staged approach we were able to avoid recurrence, preserve function, and restore facial balance without a separate donor site or an alloplastic implant.

Autologous ear reconstruction is known as one of the most difficult types of reconstruction to perform in plastic surgery. Very rarely is a trainee exposed to the level of complexity and variety of cases they will treat as a sole care provider in a tertiary care setting. This is because the learning curve is steep and those few surgeons that already perform ear reconstruction are limited in what technical experience they can offer trainees due to the plethora of factors competing against the surgeon. These include patient expectations, level of experience, length of anesthetic and accountability for results and complications. For this reason, once a plastic surgeon is nominated to provide autologous ear reconstruction, they face the daunting prospect of not only performing what is a very complex surgery with a very steep learning curve but also the judgment of their patients and colleagues. This paper charts the endeavors of the senior author to provide a service over the last 5 years. It will hopefully provide insight and context on setting up a service, dealing with complications, patient and peer expectations, and finally acknowledgment from both alike as experience is gained and excellence is reached.

Autoři článku: Contrerashu4382 (High Connolly)