Wilsonandresen9838

Z Iurium Wiki

Verze z 22. 10. 2024, 19:11, kterou vytvořil Wilsonandresen9838 (diskuse | příspěvky) (Založena nová stránka s textem „Decision-making when presented with a distal radius physeal bar is multifactorial and should incorporate the age and remaining growth potential of the pati…“)
(rozdíl) ← Starší verze | zobrazit aktuální verzi (rozdíl) | Novější verze → (rozdíl)

Decision-making when presented with a distal radius physeal bar is multifactorial and should incorporate the age and remaining growth potential of the patient, the size and location of the bar, and patient and family expectations.

Decision-making when presented with a distal radius physeal bar is multifactorial and should incorporate the age and remaining growth potential of the patient, the size and location of the bar, and patient and family expectations.

While management recommendations for distal radius fractures in both young and skeletally mature patients have been generally well-established, controversy still exists regarding optimal management in adolescent patients approaching skeletal maturity. Thus, the goal of this review is to analyze relevant literature and provide expert recommendations regarding the management of distal radius fractures in this patient population.

A PubMed search was performed to identify literature pertaining to distal radius fractures in adolescent patients, defined as 11 to 14 years in girls and 13 to 15 years in boys. Relevant articles were selected and summarized.

Distal radius fractures demonstrate significant potential for remodeling of angular deformity and bayonet apposition, even in patients older than 12 years of age. Rotational forearm range of motion and functional outcomes are acceptable with up to 15 degrees of residual angulation. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning reduces fracture redisplacement but fractures that fail nonoperative treatment.Ambient-pressure trigonal phase α of selenourea SeC(NH2)2 is noncentrosymmetric, with high Z' = 9. Under high pressure it undergoes several intriguing transformations, depending on the pressure-transmitting medium and the compression or recrystallization process. In glycerine or oil, α-SeC(NH2)2 transforms into phase β at 0.21 GPa; however in water, phase α initially increases its volume and can be compressed to 0.30 GPa due to the formation of α-SeC(NH2)2·xH2O. The single crystals of α-SeC(NH2)2 and of its partial hydrate α-SeC(NH2)2·xH2O are shattered by pressure-induced transitions. Single crystals of phase β-SeC(NH2)2 were in situ grown in a diamond-anvil cell and studied by X-ray diffraction. The monoclinic phase β is centrosymmetric, with Z' = 2. It is stable to 3.20 GPa at least, but it cannot be recovered at ambient conditions due to strongly strained NH...Se hydrogen bonds. No hydrogen-bonding motifs present in the urea structures have been found in selenourea phases α and β.Even though there has been a lot of studies on the magnetic properties of FexTiS2 and their corresponding atomic structures at different Fe concentrations, the dependency of the properties on the Fe atomic arrangement has not been fully clarified yet. In this study, FexTiS2 structures, synthesized by chemical vapor transport technique at Fe concentrations of 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20 0.25 and 0.33, were observed three-dimensionally using a transmission electron microscope and their corresponding magnetization values were measured using a superconducting quantum interference device. The results show a switch from local in-plane two-dimensional (2D) ordering of \sqrt 3 a and 2a at concentrations below 0.15 to three-dimensional (3D) ordering of 2a × 2a × 2c at x = 0.20 and 0.25, as well as \sqrt 3 a × \sqrt 3 a × 2c superstructures at x = 0.33, although it should be noted that the x = 0.20 sample only had partial ordering of Fe atoms. The type of Fe ordering present in FexTiS2 could be explained by the balance of cohesive energy of neighboring Fe atoms and local strain energy imposed on the host structure due to the formation of Fe clusters. It is also found that the switch from 2D to 3D Fe order coincides with the magnetic measurements, which reveal spin-glass behavior below x = 0.15 and ferromagnetic behavior above x = 0.20. This suggests that the magnetic properties of the FexTiS2 structure are highly influenced by the ordering of Fe atoms between planes.The pseudocubic (PC) parameterization of O4 tetrahedra [Reifenberg & Thomas (2018). Acta Cryst. B74, 165-181] is applied to quartz (SiO2) and its structural analogue germanium dioxide (GeO2). In α-quartz and GeO2, the pseudocubes are defined by three length parameters, aPC, bPC and cPC, together with an angle parameter αPC. U0126 in vivo In β-quartz, αPC has a fixed value of 90°. For quartz, the temperature evolution of parameters for the pseudocubes and the silicon ion network is established by reference to the structural refinements of Antao [Acta Cryst. (2016), B72, 249-262]. In α-quartz, the curve-fitting employed to express the non-linear temperature dependence of pseudocubic length and Si parameters exploits the model of a first-order Landau phase transition utilized by Grimm & Dorner [J. Phys. Chem. Solids (1975), 36, 407-413]. Since values of tetrahedral tilt angles about ⟨100⟩ axes also result from the pseudocubic transformation, a curve for the observed non-monotonic variation of αPC with temperature can also be fitted. Reverse transformation of curve-derived values of [Si+PC] parameters to crystallographic parameters a, c, xSi, xO, yO and zO at interpolated or extrapolated temperatures is demonstrated for α-quartz. A reverse transformation to crystallographic parameters a, c, xO is likewise carried out for β-quartz. This capability corresponds to a method of structure prediction. Support for the applicability of the approach to GeO2 is provided by analysing the structural refinements of Haines et al. [J. Solid State Chem. (2002), 166, 434-441]. An analysis of trends in tetrahedral distortion and tilt angle in α-quartz and GeO2 supports the view that GeO2 is a good model for quartz at high pressure.The crystal structures of three mackinazolinone derivatives (2-amino-6,7,8,9-tetrahydro-11H-pyrido[2,1-b]quinazolin-11-one at room temperature, and 2-nitro-6,7,8,9-tetrahydro-11H-pyrido[2,1-b]quinazolin-11-one and N-(11-oxo-6,8,9,11-tetrahydro-7H-pyrido[2,1-b]quinazolin-2-yl)benzamide at 100 K) are explored using X-ray crystallography. To delineate the different intermolecular interactions and the respective interaction energies in the crystal architectures, energy framework analyses were carried out using the CE-B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) method implemented in the CrystalExplorer software. In the structures the different molecules are linked by C-H...O, C-H...N and N-H...O hydrogen bonds. Together with these hydrogen bonds, C-H...π and C-O...π interactions are involved in the formation of a three-dimensional crystal network. A Hirshfeld surface analysis allows the visualization of the two-dimensional fingerprint plots and the quantification of the contributions of H...H, H...C/C...H and H...O/O...H contacts throughout the different crystal structures.

Autoři článku: Wilsonandresen9838 (Peters Terp)