Friisfuttrup1190

Z Iurium Wiki

Verze z 22. 10. 2024, 18:38, kterou vytvořil Friisfuttrup1190 (diskuse | příspěvky) (Založena nová stránka s textem „© The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. Association of Military Surgeons of the United States. All rights reserved. For permissions, plea…“)
(rozdíl) ← Starší verze | zobrazit aktuální verzi (rozdíl) | Novější verze → (rozdíl)

© The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. Association of Military Surgeons of the United States. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.Evaluation and management of eye trauma is daunting to many practitioners. For general medical emergencies, the familiar ABCs mnemonic serves to both recompose the provider as well as provide a logical order for evaluation and action. We recently adapted an ABCs mnemonic to provide non-ophthalmologists with a familiar method for systematically evaluating and managing eye trauma. A = ACUITY. Visual acuity is the most importance piece of information in eye trauma. B = BEST exam of BOTH eyes. Starting with acuity, examination proceeds from the front to the rear of the eye. Examine the uninjured eye first. C = CONTIGUOUS STRUCTURES and CONTACT LENSES. Examine structures contiguous to the apparent injury. Inspect for contact lens wear. D = DRUGS, DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING, and the DON'TS. Start antibiotics, antiemetics, and analgesics. Administer tetanus. Obtain computerized tomography if available. Do not attempt ocular ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging. Do not apply pressure to the eye. Do not patch the eye or apply any medication. E = EYE SHIELD and EVACUATE. Shield and ship to ophthalmology. The mnemonic was adapted to reflect current Joint Trauma Services and Tactical Combat Casualty Care practice guidelines. We believe this familiar mnemonic will serve as a useful tool in allowing non-ophthalmologists to comfortably and safely evaluate an eye for trauma. © Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.INTRODUCTION Hemorrhage control is a basic task required of first responders and typically requires technical interventions during stressful circumstances. Remote telementoring (RTM) utilizes information technology to guide inexperienced providers, but when this is useful remains undefined. METHODS Military medics were randomized to mentoring or not from an experienced subject matter expert during the application of a wound clamp (WC) to a simulated bleed. Inexperienced, nonmentored medics were given a 30-second safety briefing; mentored medics were not. Objective outcomes were time to task completion and success in arresting simulated bleeding. B-Raf inhibition RESULTS Thirty-three medics participated (16 mentored and 17 nonmentored). All (100%) successfully applies the WC to arrest the simulated hemorrhage. RTM significantly slowed hemorrhage control (P = 0.000) between the mentored (40.4 ± 12.0 seconds) and nonmentored (15.2 ± 10.3 seconds) groups. On posttask questionnaire, all medics subjectively rated the difficulty of the wound clamping as 1.7/10 (10 being extremely hard). Discussion WC application appeared to be an easily acquired technique that was effective in controlling simulated extremity exsanguination, such that RTM while feasible did not improve outcomes. Limitations were the lack of true stress and using simulation for the task. Future research should focus on determining when RTM is useful and when it is not required. © Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.INTRODUCTION Severe trauma to the spinal cord leads to a near complete loss of blood flow at the injury site along with significant hypoperfusion of adjacent tissues. Characterization and monitoring of local tissue hypoperfusion is currently not possible in clinical practice because available imaging techniques do not allow for assessment of blood flow with sufficient spatial and temporal resolutions. The objective of the current study was to determine whether ultrafast contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging could be used to visualize and quantify acute hemodynamic changes in a rat traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) model. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used novel ultrasound acquisition and processing methods that allowed for measurements of local tissue perfusion as well as for assessment of structural and functional integrity of spinal vasculature. RESULTS CEUS imaging showed that traumatic SCI results in (1) an area with significant loss of perfusion, which increased during the first hour after injury, (2) structural alterations of the spinal cord vasculature, and (3) significant slowing of arterial blood flow velocities around the injury epicenter. CONCLUSION We conclude that CEUS has the spatial and temporal sensitivity and resolution to visualize local tissue perfusion and vessel architecture, which maybe useful clinically to determine injury extent and severity in patients with SCI. © Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.INTRODUCTION Hooking up is an impersonal sexual interaction, differing from sexual activity that occurs in the context of a committed relationship. Hookup behavior has been widely studied among college populations; however, this type of sexual behavior has yet to be explored in a military population. METHODS The current study conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 male soldiers with high-risk drinking habits to explore conceptualizations of hooking up. Interviews were systematically coded and analyzed via thematic analysis. RESULTS Five themes emerged (1) definitions of hookups, (2) descriptions of why hookups occur, (3) how hookups occur (ie, the social context of hookups), (4) factors that facilitate hookups, and (5) differences between hookups and relationships. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest that perceptions of hookups among participants who were male soldiers are generally consistent with college populations, with some varying aspects. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2020.INTRODUCTION Although opioids are widely prescribed for pain, in many circumstances, they have only modest efficacy. Preclinical studies have shown that chemokines, immune mediators released during tissue injury and inflammation, can desensitize opioid receptors and block opioid analgesia by a process termed "heterologous desensitization." The present studies tested the hypothesis that in evoked pain, certain chemokine receptor antagonists (CRAs), given with a submaximal dose of morphine, would result in enhanced morphine potency. METHODS Three rodent pain assays were used incisional pain in rats, the cold-water tail flick test in rats, and the formalin test in mice. The FDA-approved, commercially available CRAs, maraviroc and AMD3100, were used. They block the chemokine receptors and ligands, CCR5/CCL5 (RANTES) and CXCR4/CXCL4 (SDF-1α), respectively. RESULTS In the incisional pain assay, it was found that the combination of a single CRA, or of both CRAs, with morphine significantly shifted the morphine dose-response curve to the left, as much as 3.

Autoři článku: Friisfuttrup1190 (Loomis Howe)