Nixonhedegaard7883

Z Iurium Wiki

Verze z 22. 10. 2024, 00:41, kterou vytvořil Nixonhedegaard7883 (diskuse | příspěvky) (Založena nová stránka s textem „A retrospective single-center analysis of 159 cases.<br /><br /> To investigate differences between male and female patients, as spinal infection (SI) repr…“)
(rozdíl) ← Starší verze | zobrazit aktuální verzi (rozdíl) | Novější verze → (rozdíl)

A retrospective single-center analysis of 159 cases.

To investigate differences between male and female patients, as spinal infection (SI) represents a life-threatening condition and numerous factors may facilitate the course and outcome of SI, including patients' age and comorbidities, as well as gender. To date, no comparative data investigating sex differences in SI is available. Thus, the purpose of the present retrospective trial was to investigate differences between male and female patients.

A total of 159 patients who were treated for a spinal infection between 2010 and 2016 at our department were included in the analysis. The patients were categorized into 2 groups based on gender. Evaluation included magnetic resonance imaging, laboratory values, clinical outcome, and conservative/operative management.

Male patients suffered from SI significantly more often than female patients (n = 101, 63.5% vs n = 58, 36.5%,

= .001). However, female patients were initially affected more severely, as innclude a better immune response and dissimilar effects of antibiotic treatment in women. Pain management in female patients is still unsatisfactory after 12 months.

Systematic review.

The objective of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes following discectomy and anterior cervical fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative disorder performed with stand-alone cages and anterior cervical plates.

Electronic searches were performed in the MEDLINE, LILACS, and Cochrane Systematic Reviews databases, according to PRISMA guidelines, with no language or date restriction. The review was registered in PROSPERO under number CRD42018109180.

Six randomized clinical trials were selected, which evaluated at least one of the objectives of this work, such as pain control, bone consolidation, neurological symptoms, and cervical lordosis, thus satisfying the inclusion criteria. Articles that did not directly compare the 2 surgical techniques were excluded. A total of 309 patients were included and the results showed no significant difference in clinical (visual analogue scale and neck disability index) or radiological (cervical lordosis and fusion) outcome between the 2 groups. The operative time was shorter in the group with stand-alone cages (mean difference = -18.40; 95% CI = [-24.89, -11.92];

< .66).

The stand-alone cages and anterior cervical plate techniques have similar clinical and radiological outcomes. see more Despite the significantly shorter operative time for one group, other randomized clinical trials are needed to establish conclusive evidence in favor of one of the comparative treatments.

The stand-alone cages and anterior cervical plate techniques have similar clinical and radiological outcomes. Despite the significantly shorter operative time for one group, other randomized clinical trials are needed to establish conclusive evidence in favor of one of the comparative treatments.

A cross-sectional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based anatomical study.

Instrumentation of the thoracic spine may be challenging due to the unique pedicle morphology and the proximity of vital structures. As prior morphological studies have mostly been done in Caucasians, our study aims to determine the optimal pedicle screw size for transpedicular fixation in an Asian population.

A retrospective analysis of 400 patients who had undergone MRI of the thoracic spine was performed. A total of 3324 pedicles were included. Pedicle morphology was graded qualitatively based on the size of its cancellous channel, and quantitatively with the following parameters pedicle transverse diameter, pedicle screw path length, and pedicle angle. Subgroup analysis based on gender was performed.

Mean pedicle transverse diameter was the narrowest at the T4 (2.9 ± 1 mm) and T5 (3.1 ± 1.1 mm) level. The mean pedicle screw path length progressively increased from T1 (34 ± 4.6 mm) to T12 (47 ± 4.6 mm). The mean pedicle angle was the largest at T1 (34° ± 7.9°) and decreased caudally, to 9.4° ± 3.8° at the T12 level. Females had significantly lower mean pedicle diameter and screw path length than males at every vertebral level; however, they had a larger pedicle angle at T8 to T10. The most common size of the pedicle cancellous channel was more than 4 mm.

Morphological differences in the Asian pedicle suggest that caution needs to be taken during thoracic spine instrumentation, particularly in Asian females who have significantly smaller pedicles. In such cases, the use of alternative techniques or intraoperative navigation may be useful.

Morphological differences in the Asian pedicle suggest that caution needs to be taken during thoracic spine instrumentation, particularly in Asian females who have significantly smaller pedicles. In such cases, the use of alternative techniques or intraoperative navigation may be useful.

Systematic review.

Anterior-alone surgery has gained wider reception for subaxial cervical spine facets dislocation. Questions remain on its efficacy and safety as a stand-alone entity within the contexts of concurrent facet fractures, unilateral versus bilateral dislocations, anterior open reduction, and old dislocation.

A systematic review was performed with search strategy using translatable MESH terms across MEDLINE, EMBASE, VHL Regional Portal, and CENTRAL databases on patients with subaxial cervical dislocation intervened via anterior-alone approach. Two reviewers independently screened for eligible studies. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) flow chart was adhered to. Nine retrospective studies were included. Narrative synthesis was performed to determine primary outcomes on spinal fusion and revisions and secondary outcomes on new occurrence or deterioration of neurology and infection rate.

Nonunion was not encountered across all contexts. A total of 0.8s safe from a neurological standpoint. Revision rate due to concurrent facet fracture is low. Certain patients may require posteriorly based surgery or in specific cases combined anterior and posterior procedures.

Autoři článku: Nixonhedegaard7883 (McMahon Mohr)