Callesenhurley7265

OBJECTIVE To describe and illustrate the histologic characteristics of luting cement-induced peri-implantitis in the posterior maxilla of a 56-year-old man. CASE PRESENTATION A dental implant inserted 6 years previously in the maxillary left first premolar region revealed pus and swelling. A periapical radiograph showed severe bone loss around the dental implant, and the presence of surrounding residual particles of luting cement. The implant was removed with its adjacent tissues. The harvested implant was fixed in formaldehyde solution (formalin). A 4-mm fragment of soft tissue and a 6-mm fragment of bone were cut from the implant specimen and submitted for routine processing of hematoxylin-eosin (h&e) slides for histologic analysis. The implant specimen was processed and embedded in glycol methacrylate resin and ground to a thickness of 50 µm for histologic examination. RESULTS The microscopic examination of the h&e slides showed connective tissue with an inflammatory infiltrate composed of histiocytes, lymphocytes, and plasma cells. Brr2 Inhibitor C9 mw There was a fragment of viable bone integrated with the bone graft material. The bone showed evidence of active resorption by osteoclasts in Howship lacunae. The implant sections showed trabecular bone with lamellar structure in the apical portion. Foreign body, compatible with luting cement, was present in the coronal portion, adjacent to the threads of the implant, as well as osteoclasts in Howship lacunae. CONCLUSION This report, documenting a case of peri-implantitis associated with excess cement extrusion, revealed that that the bone loss was associated with an inflammatory infiltrate. Additional studies focusing on the histopathologic characteristics of peri-implantitis could help to increase the knowledge of peri-implant disease to shed light on prevention and treatment.OBJECTIVE The purpose of the present study was to compare and assess maxillary edentulous patients treated with four-implant-retained overdentures and with implant-supported fixed prostheses using the All-on-4 concept in terms of patient satisfaction, oral health-related quality of life, and marginal bone loss. METHOD AND MATERIALS Thirty-three patients treated with either maxillary four-implant-retained overdentures (n = 15) or with maxillary implant-supported fixed prosthesis using the All-on-4 concept (n = 18) were compared in terms of patient satisfaction, quality of life, and marginal bone loss. Independent sample t test was used to compare the two groups in terms of satisfaction, OHIP-14 scores, and marginal bone loss. The paired sample t test was used to compare bone loss at different time intervals. The comparison of marginal bone loss with regard to implant location was accomplished with the one-way ANOVA test. P values of .05). When patient satisfaction scores were evaluated, hygiene maintenance (P = .001) and pain scores (P = .001) were significantly higher in the implant-retained overdenture group than in the implant-supported fixed prosthesis group (P less then .05). No statistically significant difference was observed between axial and tilted implants at both the 12-month (P = .59) and 24-month (P = .77) follow-up periods in the implant-supported fixed prosthesis group. CONCLUSION Four-implant-supported fixed prostheses with the All-on-4 concept and four-implant-retained overdentures present similar marginal bone loss and quality of life scores after 2 years of function. However, patients found overdentures easier to clean but more painful in comparison with the fixed prosthesis.OBJECTIVES The purpose of the present prospective and randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the clinical performance of noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) restored with different adhesion strategies on the dental substrate. METHOD AND MATERIALS An adhesive restorative system (Single Bond Universal/ Z350XT) with and without selective enamel conditioning was evaluated, as well as a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (Vitremer), with and without pretreatment with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Two operators placed a total of 200 restorations in 50 patients (four restorations per patient). Data from decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT), visible plaque, and gingival bleeding were collected prior to the restorations and at each evaluation time. All restorations were evaluated using the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) evaluation system at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months. Data were analyzed by the Friedman, chi-square, Cochran, Wilcoxon, and multiple logistic regression analysis tests (P ≤ .05). RESULTS There was a gradual and significant increase in DMFT with a difference among the three evaluations (P ≤ .001). There was no difference for the Visible Plaque Index over time (P = .28); however, there was a significant reduction in the Gingival Bleeding Index between the baseline and the other evaluations (P ≤ .001). There was no statistically significant difference among groups and periods of evaluations (P > .05). Regarding logistic regression, the model as a whole was statistically significant (P = .034). CONCLUSION The four different adhesion strategies in the NCCL restorations presented similar clinical performance after 1 year of follow-up.OBJECTIVE Distraction is a highly acceptable technique for diverting a patient's attention from what may be perceived as an unpleasant procedure, reducing anxiety and helping the patient relax. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of watching television during dental treatment on pediatric patients' anxiety and cooperation compared to the commonly used conventional Tell-Show-Do (TSD) behavioral management method. METHOD AND MATERIALS Sixty-nine children (mean age 6.8 years) scheduled to undergo restorative dental treatment were randomly divided into two intervention groups a group that was managed by television distraction and a control group that was managed by TSD. During treatment, anxiety was assessed by the Facial Image Scale and cooperative behavior was assessed by the Frankl scale. Pulse rate and oxygen saturation were also measured during the treatment. RESULTS Compared to TSD, television distraction significantly reduced anxiety by 1.27 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.798 to 1.