Mcallisteremborg5937

The relevant activity reported with avapritinib in patients carrying the D842 v mutation represents, for first time, an active therapeutic option in this resistant mutant. Crenolanib is a type I selective inhibitor of PDGFRα-resistant mutants, mainly D842 V, which is currently under clinical trial. Summary New potent TKIs are being approved, adding value to the already three registered drugs. Other agents, such as MEK inhibitors, immunotherapy and TRK-targeted therapy are potential new options in specific subsets of GIST patients.Purpose of review Genetic aberrations resulting in tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) fusion proteins can drive oncogenesis and are postulated to occur in up to 1% of solid tumours. However, TRK fusions in adult sarcomas are rare and there is a significant challenge in identifying patients with sarcomas harbouring TRK fusions in the clinical setting. Despite a recent European Society of Medical Oncology consensus article regarding screening of tumours for TRK fusions, economical and practical limitations present a barrier to widespread screening of sarcomas. Recent findings Larotrectinib and entrectinib are pan-TRK inhibitors which have both received FDA approval for the management of solid tumours harbouring NTRK fusions. Initial results of a number of clinical trials have demonstrated promising efficacy and safety data, including dramatic and durable responses in patients with sarcomas. As such, TRK inhibitors represent a promising treatment option in a small cohort of adult sarcoma patients, where currently treatment options are limited. The emergence of acquired resistance is a concern associated with TRK inhibitor therapy and a number of second-generation agents targeting TRK kinase mutations driving acquired resistance have entered early-phase clinical trials. Summary With the growing appreciation of the implications of TRK fusions, this review will summarize the emerging clinical trial data of TRK inhibitors in sarcomas. Although in their infancy, clinical trial results are encouraging, and as further results and analyses are released, we will have a greater understanding of their impact on clinical practice and the management of patients with sarcomas.Purpose of review Malignant PEComa are rare mesenchymal tumors characterized by genetic alterations actionable by target therapy. Indeed, they harbour loss of function of TSC1/TSC2, which lead to the activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, which is targetable therapeutically with mTOR inhibitors like sirolimus. STAT inhibitor A small subset of malignant PEComas instead harbor TFE3 gene fusions known to be mutually exclusive with TSC1/TSC2 loss-of-function mutations; therefore, leading to different therapeutic implication. Recent findings mTOR inhibitors showed a response rate around 40% with a median PFS of 9 months both in retrospective case series than in phase 2 prospective clinical trials, therefore, representing the most active therapeutic drug. Up to now, the issue is the lack of further therapeutic lines in the advanced setting. Chemotherapy has a marginal role, while some responses were reported using Vascular endothelial growth factor-Tyrosine kynase inhibitors (VEGF-TKI) inhibitors. Summary Malignant PEComas display some sensitivity to mTOR inhibitors. If progression thereto, no other drugs are available. Preclinical studies are ongoing to explore the potential combination of hormonal blockade in women and the potential use of PD1 checkpoint inhibitors.Purpose of review Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) represent 0.5% of sarcomas, defining a rarest among rare malignancies. It affects young adults, displaying slow-growing mass of the thigh, head and neck, and trunk. Although quite indolent, a majority of cases displays an advanced disease with lung bone or central nervous system metastasis. Complete surgery is the cornerstone of localized ASPS, and advanced diseases poorly respond to chemotherapy. Here discuss recent progress in molecular characterization of ASPS and future prospects of therapeutic approaches. Recent findings ASPS is characterized by a specific oncogenic translocation ASPSCR1-TFE3 that induce hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET) overexpression, angiogenesis, and immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment. These specific biological features have encouraged the successful exploration of MET inhibitors, antiangiogenic drugs, and immunotherapy. We reviewed the main tracks of ASPS biology and recent insights from targeted therapies is ASPS mainly driven tyrosine kinase inhibitors (especially antiangiogenics), immune-checkpoint inhibitors, and their combinations. Summary Overall, antiangiogenics and anti Programmed cell death 1/Programmed cell death ligand 1 therapies showed a significant activity in ASPS that warrants additional investigation through randomized trials to validate those results and through ancillary biological studies to better understand resistance mechanisms and biomarkers of response.Purpose of review Patients with cancer are at high risk for thrombotic events, mainly deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are among the current treatment options for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). We assessed real world data (RWD) regarding treatment patterns of CAT from 1 September 2018 to 31 January 2020. Recent findings RWD showed that LMWHs were the most common initial anticoagulation treatment for CAT. Based on these data DOACs had a lower risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism compared with LMWHs and warfarin. However, the selection bias and the small number of patients in these studies might explain this difference and these limitations should be taken into consideration. Moreover, there was no statistical difference regarding adverse events during anticoagulant treatment between LMWHs and DOACs with the limitations of RWD. As far as the duration of the treatment is concerned, the adherence ranged from 100% to 67.3% at 6 months. Summary The current review of RWD illustrates that LMWHs and DOACs are used for the treatment of CAT. LMWHs are most commonly used for the initial management of CAT. Data regarding recurrence of CAT, adverse events, compliance and duration of anticoagulant treatment should be analyzed with caution as RWD are observational studies with many limitations. Further research is needed to elucidate the best algorithm for the management of CAT.