Onealmacleod8770

steeper dose-CT lung damage response relationship at 3 months post treatment. Future study with larger number of patients and longer follow-up period is warranted to validate this finding.

This study aimed to evaluate the prescription patterns and safety profiles of oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in three Chinese hospitals.

The study analyzed the data of 50,732 patients who were prescribed oral NSAIDs from July 1, 2012 to August 31, 2019. The characteristics of these patients, the prescription patterns of NSAIDs, and the drug-related safety profiles were evaluated.

Oral NSAIDs were prescribed to patients of all ages. Of the patients, 81.88% were prescribed NSAIDs on only one occasion, and 91.64% were prescribed one type of NSAID only. The combination of different NSAIDs accounted for 2,360 person-times. Orthopedic departments most commonly used selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, while emergency departments most commonly used traditional NSAIDs. The incidences of gastrointestinal (GI) complications, cardiovascular (CV) events, and newonset hypertension were lower in patients treated with selective COX-2 inhibitors than those treated with traditional NSAIDs and NSAID combinations (P<0.05). In relation to selective COX-2 inhibitors, incidences of new-onset hypertension were lower in patients treated with imrecoxib than those treated with other types of selective COX-2 inhibitors (P=0.0102).

In respect of the at-risk patients (i.e., those with related disease, such as GI complications, CV events or other risks), the patterns with which oral NSAIDs were prescribed was not standardized. In terms of adverse effects, selective COX-2 inhibitors represent a better choice than traditional NSAIDs and NSAID combinations.

In respect of the at-risk patients (i.e., those with related disease, such as GI complications, CV events or other risks), the patterns with which oral NSAIDs were prescribed was not standardized. In terms of adverse effects, selective COX-2 inhibitors represent a better choice than traditional NSAIDs and NSAID combinations.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging pandemic of global public health concern. We aimed to summarize the characteristics of COVID-19 patients in the early stage of the pandemic and explore the risk factors of disease progression.

We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis, searching three databases for studies published between January 1, 2020, and March 18, 2020. We used random-effects models to calculate the 95% confidence intervals of pooled estimated prevalence and the odds ratio between the severe and nonsevere cases.

Ninety studies involving 16,526 COVID-19 patients were included. Hypertension (19.1%) and diabetes (9.5%) were the most common comorbidities. The most prevalent clinical symptoms were fever (78.4%), cough (58.5%), and fatigue (26.4%). Increased serum ferritin (74.2%), high C-reactive protein (73.3%), and high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (72.2%) were the most frequently reported laboratory abnormalities. Most patients had bilateral lung involvement (d mediastinal nodes was higher in severe cases.

Most COVID-19 patients have fever and cough with lymphopenia and increased inflammatory indices, and the main CT feature is GGO involved bilateral lung. Patients with comorbidities and worse clinical symptoms, laboratory characteristics, and CT findings tend to have poor disease progression.

Most COVID-19 patients have fever and cough with lymphopenia and increased inflammatory indices, and the main CT feature is GGO involved bilateral lung. Patients with comorbidities and worse clinical symptoms, laboratory characteristics, and CT findings tend to have poor disease progression.

To explore the prognostic role of ovarian endometriosis in symptomatic adenomyosis patients underwent uterine artery embolization (UAE).

This was a retrospective, single-center study. A total of 76 patients with adenomyosis who underwent UAE in The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between May 2009 and July 2016 were enrolled in this study. learn more These patients were divided into two groups based on whether complicated with ovarian endometriosis. After UAE, the patients were followed up for 12 months. The improvements of dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia were evaluated according to the symptom relief criteria. The improvement rates in both groups were analyzed and compared.

Among the 76 patients with adenomyosis, 17 (22.3%) were diagnosed with OE and 59 (77.6%) were non-OE. In the OE group, all patients (17/17, 100%) had dysmenorrhea and 11 (11/17, 64.7%) had menorrhagia. In non-OE group, 57 patients (57/59, 96.6%) had dysmenorrhea and 50 (50/59, 84.7%) had menorrhagia. The improvement rates of dysmenorrhea in the two groups were 47.1% (OE group) and 86.0% (non-OE group), respectively (P<0.05). The improvement rates of menorrhagia in the two groups were 63.6% (OE group) and 84.0% (non-OE group), respectively (P=0.263).

Patients without OE showed a lower incidence of dysmenorrhea and may have an advantage in the improvement of dysmenorrhea compared with those with OE when they underwent UAE. However, no significant difference was observed in the improvement of menorrhagia.

Patients without OE showed a lower incidence of dysmenorrhea and may have an advantage in the improvement of dysmenorrhea compared with those with OE when they underwent UAE. However, no significant difference was observed in the improvement of menorrhagia.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a potentially life-threatening contagious disease which has spread all over the world. Risk factors associated with the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 pneumonia in intensive care unit (ICU) have not yet been well determined.

This was a retrospective, single-centered, observational study, in which 47 patients with confirmed COVID-19 were consecutively enrolled from February 24 to April 5, 2020. The patients were registered from the ICU of Leishenshan Hospital in Wuhan, China. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were collected and compared between survivors and non-survivors. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to analyze the risk factors of death in patients with COVID-19.

The study cohort included 47 adult patients with an average age of 70.55±12.52 years, and 30 (63.8%) patients were men. Totally 15 (31.9%) patients died. When compared to survivors, nonsurvivors showed a higher proportion of septic shock [6 (40%) patients vs. 3 (9.4%) patients], disseminated intravascular coagulation [3 (21.