Bankeyildiz9135

Background During hip endoscopy, the iliotibial band (ITB) can be split or preserved to access the peritrochanteric workspace. To our knowledge, no comparative studies have been performed to analyze patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and surgical failure rates (gluteus medius retear and/or revision surgery rates) for ITB-sparing versus ITB-splitting approaches in endoscopic gluteus medius repairs. Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate PROs and failure rates of patients undergoing ITB-sparing versus ITB-splitting repairs of the gluteus medius. Study design Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods A systematic review was performed by following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses) guidelines and using the PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase databases. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the modified Coleman Methodology Score. Level 1-4 studies were evaluated for endoscopic abductor repair techniques on all types of gluteus. Conclusion Endoscopic gluteus medius repair is a reliable procedure to improve pain and function in appropriately selected patients. This study highlighted the lack of high-quality literature available regarding ITB approach. However, the evidence to date has suggested that ITB approach may influence hip-specific PROs. Splitting the ITB during abductor repair may be associated with a greater improvement in mHHS and lower surgical failure rates. Further prospective comparative studies are warranted to evaluate the effect of ITB approach.Background Recent studies have shown that assessment of the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) between 18° and 25° is not sufficient to adequately classify mildly dysplastic hips and that further radiological features should be considered. However, no correlation between different morphologic features and clinical outcomes has been investigated so far. Purpose To analyze the clinical outcomes of patients with different subtypes of borderline dysplastic hips who underwent arthroscopic surgery. Study design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods We examined patients with an LCEA between 18° and 25° who underwent arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome between January 2015 and December 2016. A hierarchical cluster analysis was performed to identify hip morphologic subtypes according to radiographic parameters, including the LCEA, femoro-epiphyseal acetabular roof (FEAR) index, anterior and posterior wall indices (AWI and PWI), Tönnis angle, alpha angle, and femoral neck-shaft angle. I was achieved by all patients in clusters 2 and 3, by 63% of patients in cluster 1, and by 23% of patients in cluster 4. Clusters 2 and 3 differed significantly from clusters 1 and 4 (P = .02). A postoperative PASS score of 60 was achieved by all patients in cluster 3, by 86% of patients in cluster 2, by 63% of patients in cluster 1, and by 20% of patients in cluster 4. The differences between the groups were statistically significant (P = .01). Conclusion Arthroscopic surgery yielded good results in the treatment of stable borderline hip dysplasia with anterolateral and lateral deficiency. In contrast, borderline hip dysplasia with acetabular retroversion showed no improvements after arthroscopic therapy. This study underlines the need for an accurate analysis of all possible radiological signs to adequately classify borderline dysplastic hips.Background Patients with anterior cruciate ligament-deficient (ACLD) knees with medial meniscal posterior horn tears (MMPHTs) have been reported to demonstrate a combined stiffening and pivot-shift gait pattern compared with healthy controls. Movement asymmetries are implicated in the development and progression of osteoarthritis. Purpose To investigate the knee kinematics and kinetic asymmetries in ACLD patients with (ACLD + MMPHT group) and without (ACLD group) MMPHTs while walking on level ground. Study design Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods A total of 15 patients with isolated unilateral ACL ruptures, 10 with unilateral ACL ruptures and MMPHTs, and 22 healthy controls underwent gait testing between January 2014 and December 2016. Between-leg differences (BLDs) in knee kinematics and kinetics were compared among participants in all groups. Results The ACLD + MMPHT group demonstrated significantly greater BLDs in knee moments in the sagittal plane during the loading response phase than an the ACLD and control groups during the loading response phase. AZD1208 mouse Both the ACLD + MMPHT and the ACLD groups demonstrated significant knee angle and moment asymmetries in the sagittal plane during the terminal stance phase than the control group. Both the ACLD + MMPHT and the ACLD groups demonstrated knee rotation moment asymmetries during the midstance and terminal stance phases compared with the control group. A rehabilitation program for ACLD patients both with and without MMPHTs should take into consideration these asymmetric gait patterns.Background The rate of return to sport after surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome (FAIS) has been studied in high-level athletes. However, few studies examining this rate have focused exclusively on National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I athletes. Purpose To evaluate the return-to-sport rate after hip arthroscopy for FAIS and to examine the influence of sport type on the clinical presentation of FAIS in collegiate athletes. Study design Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods Included in this study were NCAA Division I student-athletes who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAIS at our institution between 2010 and 2017. Exclusion criteria were history of previous hip pathology, pediatric hip disease, radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade >0), prior lower extremity procedure, history of chronic pain, osteoporosis, or history of systemic inflammatory disease. Athletes were categorized into 6 subgroups based on the type of sport (cutting, contact, enreturn-to-sport rates based on the sport type except for endurance athletes, who returned at a lower rate (66.6%; P less then .001). No differences in return-to-sport rate (P = .411), duration after return (P = .265), or highest attempted level of sport resumed (P = .625) were found between patients who underwent labral repair versus debridement. Conclusion Collegiate-level athletes who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAIS returned to sport at high and predictable rates, with endurance athletes possibly returning to sport at lower rates than all other sport types. Surgical procedures may be influenced by sport type, but the rate of return to sport between athletes who underwent labral debridement versus labral repair was similar.