Jespersenmcgee1819

of NEC.

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the surgical hospitalist system on postoperative outcomes and hospital costs for surgical patients.

We reviewed the medical records of 522 patients who were admitted to the divisions of colorectal and gastrointestinal surgery for operation from September to December 2017 at Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine in Seoul, Korea. All patients were divided into 2 groups; one that was managed by surgical hospitalists group (HG) and another that was managed by non-hospitalist residents group (NHG) after elective surgery. Postoperative outcomes and hospital costs were analyzed for each group.

Two hundred ninety-eight patients were managed by HG and 189 patients were managed by NHG after surgery. The length of hospital stay in the first group was shorter (9.6 ± 5.8 days

12.2 ± 7.9 days, P < 0.001), the incidence of complications was lower (44.6%

55.6%, P = 0.019), and the readmission rate was lower (3.0%

6.9%, P = 0.046) in the HG than in the NHG. The difference in total hospital costs was not significant between the HG and the NHG (₩8,381,304

₩9,242,493, P = 0.559), but surgery-independent hospital costs were lower in the HG than in the NHG (₩3,020,873

₩3,923,308, P = 0.001).

The surgical hospitalist system reduced the length of hospital stay, the incidence of postoperative complications, and the readmission rates of surgical patients. This led to the effect of a reduction in total hospital costs.

The surgical hospitalist system reduced the length of hospital stay, the incidence of postoperative complications, and the readmission rates of surgical patients. This led to the effect of a reduction in total hospital costs.

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is one of the most common aortic emergencies in vascular surgery and is associated with high operative mortality and morbidity rates despite recent treatment advances. mTOR inhibitor We evaluated operative mortality risks for the outcomes of emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (eEVAR)

open repair in rAAA.

Twenty patients underwent eEVAR (n = 12) or open repair (n = 8) for rAAA between 2016 and 2020. We adopted the EVAR first strategy since 2018. Primary endpoints included in-hospital mortality and 1-year survival. The outcome variables were analyzed with Fisher exact, Mann-Whitney test, and linear by linear association. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival.

There were 13 males (65.0%) and the median age of the study cohort was 78.0 years (range, 49-88 years). In-hospital mortality occurred in 7 patients (35.0%); 5 (50.0%) in the early period and 2 (20.0%) in the later period of this series. According to the procedure type, 4 (50.0%) and 3 (25.0%) in-hospital mortalities occurred in the open repair and eEVAR patients, respectively. In 6 patients (50.0%), eEVAR was performed on unfavorable anatomy. The 1-year survival of eEVAR

open repair group was 75% ± 12.5% and 50% ± 17.7%, respectively. On univariate analysis, preoperative high-risk indices, postoperative acute renal failure requiring dialysis, pulmonary complications, and prolonged mechanical ventilation were associated with higher operative mortality.

The current data showed relatively superior outcomes with eEVAR

open repair for rAAA, even in some patients with unfavorable anatomy supporting the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of EVAR first strategy.

The current data showed relatively superior outcomes with eEVAR vs. open repair for rAAA, even in some patients with unfavorable anatomy supporting the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of EVAR first strategy.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has been accepted as a standard treatment for stage II-III rectal cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer and effects on overall survival (OS) of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in South Korea.

Patients who underwent curative resection for rectal cancer from 2014 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed from the database of the National Quality Assessment program in South Korea. Patients were categorized into the upfront surgery group and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group. We evaluated factors associated with the administration of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and its effects on OS. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed to account for baseline differences between subgroups.

A total of 6,141 patients were categorized into the upfront surgery group (n = 4,237) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group (n = 1,904). The neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was more frequently administered to male, midrectal cancer, and younger patients. In the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group, old age, underweight, and pathologic stage were significant risk factors of OS, and male sex, the level of tumor and clinical stages were not associated with OS. After adjustment, the OS of the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group followed the OS of the upfront surgery group of the same pathologic stage.

Male sex and the level of tumor were not related to the OS of rectal cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The OS of patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was decided by their pathologic stages regardless of clinical stages.

Male sex and the level of tumor were not related to the OS of rectal cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The OS of patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was decided by their pathologic stages regardless of clinical stages.

This study aims to evaluate the effect of different pneumoperitoneum pressures on postoperative pain, especially by subcategorizing the pressures into 3 groups during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

We conducted a prospective randomized, double-blinded study of 150 patients with benign and uncomplicated gallbladder disease. They were categorized into 3 groups. Each group (50 patients) underwent LC with different pneumoperitoneum methods group VLP, very-low pressure (6-8 mmHg); group LP, low pressure (9-11 mmHg); and group SP, standard pressure (12-14 mmHg). The 3 groups were compared for pain intensity, duration, analgesic requirement, and complications.

The characteristics of the patients were similar among all groups. Postoperative pain scores at each time point (1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours) were not significantly different among the 3 groups. Further, operation time, hospital stay, the number of analgesic consumption doses, and postoperative complications were not significantly different among the 3 groups.