Appelspencer9919

Z Iurium Wiki

Verze z 29. 9. 2024, 16:14, kterou vytvořil Appelspencer9919 (diskuse | příspěvky) (Založena nová stránka s textem „Fourteen studies (78%) demonstrated improvements in students' attitude-related outcomes, 13 (72%) studies demonstrated improvements in skills-related outco…“)
(rozdíl) ← Starší verze | zobrazit aktuální verzi (rozdíl) | Novější verze → (rozdíl)

Fourteen studies (78%) demonstrated improvements in students' attitude-related outcomes, 13 (72%) studies demonstrated improvements in skills-related outcomes, and six studies (33%) described improvements in knowledge related outcomes.Conclusion. Teamwork is regarded as an integral component of being an effective health care professional. While teamwork is common in pharmacy curricula, few studies describe strategies for teaching effective teamwork strategies to pharmacy students. The articles reviewed revealed a wide range of approaches to teaching, measuring, and assessing teamwork skills within pharmacy education. This review highlights an opportunity to further explore and identify the teamwork skills that are requisite for success in pharmacy practice, which could then be supported by standardized teamwork training programs and assessments.Objective. To determine whether the exposure to sterile compounding in the pharmacy curriculum produces Doctor of Pharmacy graduates who are both competent and confident in the area of sterile compounding, and to identify additional variables that may predict student performance.Methods. Participants were recruited from the fourth-year pharmacy class of 2018 at one university. The students were asked to complete a questionnaire assessing the following domains demographics, confidence in compounding performance, prior experience, and theoretical knowledge. A written assessment was followed by a faculty-evaluated practicum in which the students were required to prepare two sterile products using a standardized rubric. Results were analyzed with a Student t test and linear regression to determine differences in performance based upon prior experience, confidence, and theoretical knowledge.Results. Overall, the 158 students performed well on the knowledge and skill examination, achieving an average total score of 89.8%. Of the 158 total participants, the 122 survey respondents had an overall mean confidence score of 2.9 on a four-point Likert scale, with 40.2% of students scoring in the confident or very confident range of the survey. In our analysis, we found that neither prior compounding experience or self-rated confidence were predictive of students' total score.Conclusion. The results of this study suggest that the inclusion of sterile compounding education and training in all four years of the pharmacy curriculum produces PharmD graduates who are competent, with varying levels of confidence in the area of sterile compounding.Objective. To identify the way colleges and schools of pharmacy in the United States assess the performance of volunteer preceptors who precept students in advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs).Methods. In the summer and fall semesters of 2018, directors of experiential education were invited to complete an online, self-administered questionnaire that included questions dealing with assessment of APPE volunteer preceptors related to promotion and reappointment procedures, abilities and attributes assessed, methods of assessment, and frequency of conducting such assessments. Several attempts were made via email and phone to encourage participation.Results. Eighty-one of 132 (61.4%) fully accredited programs responded with all but one reporting that they evaluated the performance of APPE volunteer preceptors. Forty-one of these 80 (51.3%) indicated that preceptors cannot be promoted in rank, while 47 (58.8%) had a process for preceptor reappointment. The most commonly assessed preceptor abilities and attributes were accessibility, ability to provide feedback to students, communication skills, and professional demeanor. The most reported assessment strategies were summative student evaluations and on-site evaluation of the preceptor by college or school personnel. The frequency of assessments varied based on the assessment method the institution used.Conclusion. Assessment of APPE volunteer preceptors was an integral component of the quality assurance process at almost all responding US pharmacy colleges and schools. The institutions evaluated various preceptor abilities and attributes and used multiple assessment strategies. Findings from this study may help programs review their existing assessment practices, implement new ones, and help to standardize preceptor assessment.Addressing health care provider burnout has become a top priority for many health care systems. Unfortunately, a paucity of literature is available on preventing and managing burnout in pharmacy residents despite an increase in articles on the prevalence of pharmacy burnout. This limits the ability of pharmacy managers to understand and address burnout in this high-risk population. Until further investigation into the most beneficial, evidence-based strategies for managing burnout in this population is conducted, this commentary offers strategies to address and mitigate burnout in pharmacy residency training programs based on the available interdisciplinary literature.The authors have first-hand experience with burnout and aim to begin a paradigm shift to emphasize well-being and reshape the culture of postgraduate training. Dr. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/nx-5948.html Potter has dedicated time to developing programming and founded an interprofessional well-being organization called Mindfulness in Newly Developing Students of Healthcare (MINDS) for health care students and providing recommendations for pharmacy residency programs. As a program director, Dr. Cadiz focuses on the development of realistic and effective strategies to eliminate burnout and foster well-being in her pharmacy residency training program.Objective. To evaluate a tool designed to assess Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) students' personal and professional development prior to beginning advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs).Methods. A five-item instrument, entitled the Faculty Advisor's Assessment of the Advisee (FAAA) tool, was developed to assess and monitor pharmacy students' progress over the three-year didactic curriculum. Question anchors were created to describe characteristics exhibited by the student that matched categories of not engaged, beginning, emerging, or engaged. Possible FAAA composite scores ranged from 7 to 20. Using the FAAA tool, faculty advisors assessed their advisees' values, engagement, self-awareness, professionalism, and leadership in 2017, 2018, and 2019. Individual and aggregate cohort reports were run and data for each of the three years were matched with students. To determine if the FAAA showed progression in assessed dimensions in the students during the first, second, and third professional (P1, P2, and P3) years, a Friedman test was performed. Cronbach alpha was used to assess the reliability of the instrument.Results. The data of 93 students were matched for the P1 through the P3 years. Median (IQR) for the FAAA composite score levels for the P1, P2, and P3 were 13 (12-16), 17 (15-19) and 18 (16-20), respectively. Significant differences existed at all timepoints compared, including from the P1 to P2, P2 to P3, and P1 to P3 years. The reliability of the FAAA scale was strong across all three years (winter 2017, α=0.87; winter 2018, α=0.89; and winter 2019, α=0.87). All items appeared worthy of retention as removal did not significantly increase their reliability.Conclusion. A five-item tool which assesses pharmacy students' personal and professional development during the first three years of a PharmD program could be used by faculty advisors to assess student's progress across the didactic curriculum.Objective. To identify national trends among US pharmacy schools and colleges in their requirements for the Pharmacy College Admission Test (PCAT) and underlying rationales for not requiring pharmacy school applicants to take it.Methods. An electronic survey regarding the following was sent to all US pharmacy programs current and future PCAT requirements for applicants, use of the PCAT or other means to assess applicants' written communication skills, use of unofficial PCAT scores, and, if applicable, the rationale for not requiring applicants to submit PCAT scores. Data analysis was performed using Excel.Results. One hundred five (73%) of 144 schools and colleges of pharmacy responded to the survey. Twelve institutions discontinued the PCAT requirement between the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 admissions cycles. The most commonly selected reason for discontinuation was a desire to increase pharmacy applications by reducing admission barriers. Pharmacy schools nationwide had concerns regarding high PCAT registration fees. The majority of pharmacy programs that used PCAT scores in their application process indicated that they always, often, or sometimes invited applicants for an interview before they had received the applicant's official PCAT scores. The majority of pharmacy programs considered applicants' PCAT writing score in making their admissions decisions. Other methods used included onsite essays and personal statements.Conclusion. At the time of this study the majority of US pharmacy schools required applicants to submit the PCAT scores before being considered for admission to pharmacy school; however, the use of this examination has declined nationally.Objective. To explore and evaluate open-ended feedback on entrustable professional activities (EPAs) provided by preceptors to Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) students completing their first practice experience.Methods. A retrospective review was conducted of qualitative data collected from preceptor evaluations of student pharmacists who had completed a two-month practice experience in either community or health-system pharmacy at the end of their first professional year. Preceptors had used a validated EPA framework to assess students. A codebook was developed around the EPA framework and sub-coding was used to indicate positive, negative, or neutral assessment within each EPA. After several rounds of coding, consensus was reached for all codes by two investigators. A dependability audit was implemented to ensure the trustworthiness of the findings.Results. Preceptor evaluations of 153 student pharmacists were included in the study. Eighty students (52.3%) had completed a community experience and 73 (47.7%) had completed a health-system experience between May and August 2018. The preceptors at both practice settings provided overwhelmingly positive feedback on all EPAs. Opportunities to optimize preceptor-provided feedback were identified. The feedback provided by the preceptors in health-system and community practice settings focused on knowledge and behavior, respectively, with both emphasizing students' skill-based performance.Conclusion. This study provides valuable insight into optimizing preceptor-provided written feedback on EPAs. Conducting deeper analysis of preceptor feedback using focus groups or structured interviews is suggested to further explore preceptors' provision of EPA assessment to student pharmacists practicing in real-world settings.Objective. To evaluate how pharmacy programs administer and evaluate American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) curriculum quality perception surveys for continuous quality improvement, and to compare usage across the academy to the Principles of Good Use AACP Quality Perception Surveys document.Methods. A 27-item survey instrument examining how schools used the curriculum quality survey was created and administered between March and June 2019 to assessment contacts of accredited schools and colleges of pharmacy. Descriptive statistics were performed for each survey item.Results. Of the 140 programs invited to participate, 88 (62.8%) responded. Curriculum quality survey data were triangulated with additional existing data (39.8%) or additional data sources were collected for triangulation with the survey data (54.5%). Programs reported on modifications made in the following areas curriculum (85.2%), communication (75.0%), student services (68.2%), policy and process (61.4%), and professional development (53.

Autoři článku: Appelspencer9919 (Astrup Spence)