Thomsenpuggaard1048

2 (95% CI 1.4-3.0), 3.0 (1.9-4.1) and 3.0 (1.7-4.7) mmHg higher SBP compared with those on BB (adjusted model, P = 0.007, 0.008 and 0.017, respectively). OICR-9429 In those with a combination of two antihypertensive drugs, SBP was 5.5 (4.0-7.1), 5.1 (3.7-6.6), 4.3 (2.5-6.1) and 3.1 (1.6-4.6) mmHg higher in those on CCB/RAB, BB/RAB, BB/CCB or diuretic/RAB compared with those on BB/diuretic (adjusted model, P < 0.001, <0.001, 0.018 and 0.036, respectively).

Poorly controlled blood pressure was common in OSA patients with antihypertensive medication. Treatment with BB alone or BB in combination with a diuretic was associated with the lowest systolic pressure in this large clinical cohort.

Poorly controlled blood pressure was common in OSA patients with antihypertensive medication. Treatment with BB alone or BB in combination with a diuretic was associated with the lowest systolic pressure in this large clinical cohort.

Adequate blood pressure (BP) control is pivotal for managing chronic kidney disease (CKD). The optimal approach for monitoring BP to delay CKD progression is not yet clear.

Patients with hypertension and CKD stage 3-4 were randomized into ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) or office BP groups. All patients had ABPM at baseline and 18 months, and the ABPM group additionally underwent ABPM at 3 and 6 months. Each ABPM result was notified only for the ABPM group. The BP target was daytime ABP less than 135/85 mmHg for the ABPM group and office BP less than 140/90 mmHg for the office BP group. The primary outcome was decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) during 18 months.

A total of 146 patients were randomized into the ABPM (n = 69) and office BP groups (n = 77). Although office BP was comparable in the two groups at baseline, daytime ABP was higher in the ABPM group (median 140 vs. 132 mmHg). Initial eGFR was 35.7 ± 12.5 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the ABPM group and 34.6 ± 12.0 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the office BP group. eGFR change was -5.5 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -7.7 to  -3.4] ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the ABPM group and -5.0 (95% CI -6.9 to -3.0) ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the office BP group (P = 0.704). Renal events occurred in 10 patients (15.6%) from the ABPM group and five (7.1%) from the office BP group (P = 0.120).

The present study did not show a beneficial effect of ABPM for controlling hypertension in CKD compared with conventional office BP monitoring in terms of renal outcomes.

The present study did not show a beneficial effect of ABPM for controlling hypertension in CKD compared with conventional office BP monitoring in terms of renal outcomes.

Although the detrimental effect of increased mean blood pressure (BP) is well established, the role of the dynamic and circadian features of BP is less well defined but may be similarly important. In this prospective analysis of hypertensive patients from a tertiary hospital hypertension clinic, we investigated whether the presence of night-time systolic hypertension is associated with more pronounced end-organ damage as assessed by measures of pulse wave analysis (PWA) and pulse wave velocity (PWV).

A cohort of 222 consecutive hypertensive patients underwent ambulatory blood pressure measurements, PWA, PWV testing and collection of routine clinical data. Group differences and group-effects of daytime and night-time hypertension on target organ damage and cardiovascular risk parameters were analysed.

Nocturnal hypertension was evident in more than half of the study population. PWV, central systolic, mean arterial and pulse pressure were higher in patients with nocturnal hypertension. Stratification intotime hypertension as an independent explanatory variable for elevated PWV.

Blood pressure variability (BPV) is recognized as a prognostic contributor in hypertension. We aimed to assess differences in short-term BPV in treated hypertensive patients depending on the number, classes, combinations and individual compounds of the antihypertensive treatment.

We selected 38 188 treated patients from the Spanish Ambulatory BP Monitoring (ABPM) Registry. SBP and DBP standard deviations (SD) from 24-h, daytime and night-time, weighted SD (WSD), and average real variability (ARV) were calculated through ABPM. They were compared (after adjustment for clinical confounders and BP) depending on the number of antihypertensive drugs, antihypertensive drug classes and compounds (in 13 765 patients on monotherapy), or combinations (in 12 716 patients treated with two drugs and 7888 treated with three drugs).

Systolic and diastolic BPV significantly increased in patients treated with multiple drugs with respect to monotherapy. Among drug classes, calcium channel blockers, especially amlodipine, V reduction as an additional treatment target.

Although cerebral microbleeds predict the occurrence and recurrence of cerebrovascular events in stroke patients, their clinical impacts are unclear in coronary artery disease patients. We aimed to investigate the clinical effect of the presence of cerebral microbleeds in patients with coronary artery disease receiving antithrombotic treatment.

We included 447 coronary artery disease patients taking at least one thrombotic agent who underwent brain MRI. The association between the presence of cerebral microbleeds and incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was investigated.

Cerebral microbleeds were identified in 18.7% of patients. Median follow-up duration was 1055 (interquartile range, 781-1172) days. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that patients with cerebral microbleeds had a higher incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events than those without (log-rank P = 0.003). A multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the presence of cerebral microing with the established guidelines may be beneficial in the management of coronary artery disease patients.

Recently, more sophisticated blood pressure (BP) measurements, such as central and ambulatory BP (ABP), have proven to be stronger predictors of future cardiovascular disease than conventional office BP. Their predictive value for atrial fibrillation development is not established. We investigated the prognostic impact for incident atrial fibrillation of office, central and ambulatory BP measurements in a predominantly older population-based cohort.

Of 1004 participants in the Cardiovascular Abnormalities and Brain Lesions (CABL) study, 769 in sinus rhythm with no history of atrial fibrillation or stroke (mean age 70.5 years) underwent ABP and arterial wave reflection analysis for central BP determination. Fine and Gray's proportional subdistribution hazards models were used to assess the association of BP parameters with incident atrial fibrillation.

During 9.5 years, atrial fibrillation occurred in 83 participants. No office BP variable showed a significant association with incident atrial fibrillation.