Ashleygibbons9313

Z Iurium Wiki

Verze z 24. 9. 2024, 10:39, kterou vytvořil Ashleygibbons9313 (diskuse | příspěvky) (Založena nová stránka s textem „OBJECTIVE To determine whether preoperative warming can reduce the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) after surgery. BACKGROUND Intraoperative hypotherm…“)
(rozdíl) ← Starší verze | zobrazit aktuální verzi (rozdíl) | Novější verze → (rozdíl)

OBJECTIVE To determine whether preoperative warming can reduce the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) after surgery. BACKGROUND Intraoperative hypothermia is a risk factor for the occurrence of SSI in patients after surgery. However, the effectiveness of preoperative warming in reducing the incidence of the condition remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the risk of SSI after surgery with and without the use of a preoperative warming protocol. The primary outcome measure was the diagnosis of SSI within 10-90 days of surgery. The pooled risk ratio was estimated with a fixed-effect meta-analysis. Sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the impact of the structural design of preoperative warming on the pooled risk of SSI. RESULTS Of the 249 studies identified, seven RCTs representing 1086 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. The use of preoperative warming was associated with a significant decrease in SSI (RR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.87, P = 0.072). Specifically, we defined patients who used forced-air warming (FAW) and integrated measures such as liquid heating and warming blankets as the MIX group and patients who used only FAW as the FAW group. Patients who used MIX methods (temperature set less then 43 °C and 30-min prewarming) before surgery benefited more from prewarming. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that preoperative warming can reduce rates of SSI after surgery. We, therefore, recommend the application of MIX warming methods before surgery. BACKGROUND Determining surgical treatment is difficult in blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) patients with isolated free fluid without solid organ injury (IFFWSOI) on abdominal computed tomography (CT). We investigated the laboratory, clinical, and radiologic features of BAT patients with IFFWSOI on abdominal CT requiring surgery. METHODS A retrospective medical record review was performed for patients treated at our government-established regional tertiary trauma center from March 2014 to August 2018. A total of 501 patients were identified and reviewed. Patients were divided into Surgery and No Surgery groups for analysis. The Surgery group included patients who underwent surgery during the index admission, while the No Surgery group included patients who did not undergo surgery. RESULTS There were significantly more cases of severe fluid collection (61.5% vs. 11.8%; p less then 0.001), car accidents (69.2% vs. 35.3%; p = 0.018), and abdominal pain (87.2% vs. MNU chemical molecular weight 58.8%; p = 0.031) at the emergency department in the Surgery group. Regarding laboratory studies performed at the emergency department, only the median amylase level was significantly higher in the No Surgery group (54.5 U/L vs. 62.5 U/L; p = 0.048). On multivariate logistic regression analysis with adjustments for age and sex, the odds ratio (OR) for severe fluid collection on abdominal CT to predict surgery was 13.52 (p = 0.006), while the OR for abdominal pain was 7.34 (p = 0.036) and the OR for car accident was 2.14 (p = 0.329). link2 In addition, a multivariate logistic regression with adjustment for age, sex, delta neutrophil index, and C-reactive protein, showed the same propensity as the other model, although statistical significance was retained only for severe fluid collection. CONCLUSION Surgical treatment should be actively considered in the presence of a large volume of intra-abdominal free fluid, especially when concomitant with abdominal pain or after car accidents in BAT patients without solid organ injury. BACKGROUND Surgical animal models are used in pre-clinical scientific studies. To date there has not been an analysis of how effective these data are when translated to human/clinical research. In this retrospective review, we evaluate the impact of studies using surgical animal models on human/clinical research through study-level analysis of citations. METHODS The top two ranking clinical journals based on impact factor for the top ten surgical specialties were identified and a search was run on PubMed to identify studies using surgical animal models published in the years 2007 and 2008. The translation to human/clinical research of each study was evaluated by analyzing the frequency of citation in human studies over the ten years following publication. Regression was used to identify predictors of citation in human/clinical research. RESULTS 411 animal studies using surgical models were identified. Over the course of the 10 years following publication the original animal studies were cited 6063 times, with 1300 (21.4%) citations in human/clinical studies and 4763 (78.6%) in animal/basic science studies. link3 The median number of citations in human/clinical research was 1 (IQR 0-5). Regression showed an association between citation in human/clinical research and the use of porcine models and the specialties of general surgery, oral and maxillofacial surgery, orthopedic surgery, transplant, and plastic surgery. CONCLUSION The use of animal models in surgical research shows poor translation to human/clinical research. Alternative surgical models should urgently be explored. INTRODUCTION Anastomotic leaks remain a major complication following oesophagectomy, accounting for high morbidity and mortality. Recently, gastric ischaemic conditioning (GIC) has been proposed to improve anastomotic integrity through neovascularisation of the gastric conduit. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to determine the impact of GIC on postoperative outcomes following oesophagectomy. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies reporting GIC for any indication of oesophageal resection up to April 25, 2019. The primary outcome was anastomotic leak. Secondary outcomes were conduit necrosis, anastomotic strictures, overall and major complications or in-hospital mortality. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects modelling. RESULTS Nineteen studies reported on GIC, of which 13 were comparative studies. GIC was performed through ligation in 13 studies and embolisation in six studies. GIC did not appear to reduce anastomotic leakages (OR 0.80, CI95 0.51-1.24, p = 0.3), anastomotic strictures (OR 0.75, CI95 0.35-1.60, p = 0.5), overall complications (OR 1.02, CI95 0.48-2.16, p = 0.9), major complications (OR 1.06, CI95 0.53-2.11, p = 0.9), or in-hospital mortality (OR 0.70, CI95 0.32-1.53, p = 0.4). However, GIC was associated with reduced rates of conduit necrosis (OR 0.30, CI95 0.11-0.77, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION GIC does not appear to reduce overall rates of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy but seems to reduce severity of leakages. More in depth studies are recommended. BACKGROUND A baseline assessment of surgical capacity is recommended as a first-step to surgical system strengthening in order to inform national policy. In Ethiopia, the World Health Organization's Tool for Situational Analysis (WHO SAT) was adapted to assess surgical, obstetric, and anesthesia capacity as part of a national initiative Saving Lives Through Safe Surgery (SaLTS). This study describes the process of adapting this tool and initial results. MATERIALS AND METHODS The new tool was used to evaluate fourteen hospitals in the Southern Nations, Nationalities, and People's Region of Ethiopia between February and March 2017. Two analytic methods were employed. To compare this data to international metrics, the WHO Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) framework was used. To assess congruence with national policy, data was evaluated against Ethiopian SaLTS targets. RESULTS Facilities had on average 62% of SARA items necessary for both basic surgery and comprehensive surgery. Primary, general, and specialized facilities offered on average 84%, 100%, and 100% of SARA basic surgeries, and 58%, 73% and 90% of SARA comprehensive surgeries, respectively. An average of 68% of SaLTS primary surgeries were available at primary facilities, 83% at general facilities, and 100% at specialized facilities. General and specialized hospitals offered an average of 80% of SaLTS general surgeries, while one specialized hospital offered 38% of SaLTS specialized surgeries. CONCLUSION While the modified SaLTS Tool provided evaluation against Ethiopian national benchmarks, the resultant assessment was much lengthier than standard international tools. Analysis of results using the SARA framework allowed for comparison to global standards and provided insight into essential parts of the tool. An assessment tool for national surgical policy should maintain internationally comparable metrics and incorporation into existing surveys when possible, while including country-specific targets. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Needle insertion pain during spinal anesthesia is an unpleasant experience for patients. This study aimed to investigate the effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on the pain intensity during the insertion of spinal needles in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia, ImamReza hospital in Kermanshah, Iran, in 2018. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a double-blind clinical trial, 60 candidates for elective Trans Ureteral Lithotripsy surgery under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into intervention and control groups. The electrodes of the TENS device were placed in the space between L3-L4 and L5-S1 vertebrae. The intensity of pain during insertion of the spinal needle by Visual Analog Scale and the frequency of attempts were recorded. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 19. RESULTS The study samples were 41.66% female and 58.33% male. The mean age of the study samples was 34.26 ± 5.07 and 32.8 ± 5.28 in the control and intervention group, respectively. The pain intensity during insertion of spinal needles was less significant in the intervention group compared to the control group (P = 0.001). The number of attempts to insert the spinal needle between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.51). The duration of implementation spinal anesthesia procedure by physician was less significant in the intervention group (P=0.001). CONCLUSION According to the results of the study, the use of TENS effectively reduced the pain of spinal needle insertion. Considering these beneficial effects, it is suggested that this procedure be used to relive pain in patients with spinal anesthesia. V.Prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents is high, not only in Western countries but also in developing countries. Efforts to improve prevention and treatment programs are needed. Given their essential role in weight problems, knowledge of determinants of problematic eating behavior ('External Eating' and 'Emotional Eating') is crucial for intervention development. Inspired by Appelhans' Dual Process Theory of Eating Behavior, the present study evaluated the importance of top-down regulative capacities and bottom-up reactivity, using the CIBER approach. CIBER is an innovative statistical approach to test the importance of behavior determinants, based on confidence intervals, instead of significance testing of point estimates. Survey data on different aspects of executive functioning (as indices of regulative capacities Inhibition, Cognitive Flexibility, Emotional Control, Initiation, Working Memory, Planning/Organizing, Organization of materials, and Monitoring) and reward sensitivity (as an index of reactivity) were collected in a large sample of children and adolescents (n = 572) with severe obesity (adjBMI > 180%).

Autoři článku: Ashleygibbons9313 (Reese Herring)