Gouldriise4468

Z Iurium Wiki

Verze z 20. 9. 2024, 14:11, kterou vytvořil Gouldriise4468 (diskuse | příspěvky) (Založena nová stránka s textem „The Nippon Storm Study was a prospective observational study designed to gather clinical data on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in Ja…“)
(rozdíl) ← Starší verze | zobrazit aktuální verzi (rozdíl) | Novější verze → (rozdíl)

The Nippon Storm Study was a prospective observational study designed to gather clinical data on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in Japanese patients.

The purpose of this subanalysis was to compare the incidence of ICD therapy in patients with left ventricular dysfunction owing to coronary artery disease (CAD) for primary and secondary prophylaxis of sudden cardiac death.

We analyzed data of 493 patients with CAD and ICDs (men, 87%; age, 68 ± 10 years; left ventricular ejection fraction, 36% ± 13%; primary prophylaxis, 36%). All patients were followed up for at least 2 years. Propensity score matching was used to select patient subgroups for comparison 133 patients with ICD for primary prophylaxis and 133 with ICD for secondary indications.

There were no significant differences between primary and secondary prophylaxis groups with respect to the incidence of appropriate ICD therapy within 2 years (0.153 vs 0.239; hazard ratio, 1.565 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.898-2.727];

= .114). Two-year electrical storm risks were 3.3% and 9.6% with HR = 3.236 (95% CI, 1.058-9.896;

= .039) in patients with primary and secondary prophylaxis, respectively.

The incidence of ICD therapy received by patients with CAD for primary and secondary prophylaxis was not significantly different based on our propensity score-matched analysis. However, secondary-prophylaxis ICD therapy seems to be associated with a significantly higher risk for electrical storm than primary-prophylaxis ICD therapy.

The incidence of ICD therapy received by patients with CAD for primary and secondary prophylaxis was not significantly different based on our propensity score-matched analysis. However, secondary-prophylaxis ICD therapy seems to be associated with a significantly higher risk for electrical storm than primary-prophylaxis ICD therapy.

Outcomes of patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and low ejection fraction implanted with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D), especially in contemporary, real-life cohorts, are not fully understood.

We aimed to better characterize outcomes of death and ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, implanted with an ICD or CRT-D, and specifically assess differences by sex.

The AnaLysIs of Both Sex and Device Specific FactoRs on Outcomes in PAtients with Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (BIO-LIBRA) study was designed to prospectively assess outcomes of device-treated ventricular tachyarrhythmias and all-cause mortality events in nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients, indicated for an ICD or CRT-D implantation for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD), with a specific focus on sex differences. We will enroll a total of 1000 subjects across 50 U.S. sites and follow patients for up to 3 years.

The primary objective of BIO-LIBRA is to evaluate the combined risk of all-cause mortality and treated ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) events by subject sex and by implanted device type. We will also assess all-cause mortality, VT or VF alone, cardiac death, and SCD in the total cohort, as well as by subject sex and by the implanted device type. In addition, the previously validated Seattle Proportional Risk Model (SPRM) will be used to compare the SPRM predicted incidence of SCD to the observed incidence.

The BIO-LIBRA study will provide novel and contemporary information regarding outcomes in patients with a NICM who receive a defibrillator.

The BIO-LIBRA study will provide novel and contemporary information regarding outcomes in patients with a NICM who receive a defibrillator.

Bidirectional ventricular tachycardia (BD-VT) is an intriguing arrhythmia, characterized by a beat-to-beat alternation of the QRS polarity on electrocardiogram. PF-04620110 price Currently there is no simple BD-VT animal model.

We report a simple animal model of BD-VT induced by caffeine and dobutamine (C+D) challenge in normal rats in which the arrhythmia can be attenuated by dantrolene (a ryanodine receptor stabilizer) treatment, but not by the pacemaker channel blocker ivabradine treatment.

Adult (4-5 months old) Sprague-Dawley rats (both sexes) were randomized into C+D (n = 8, received caffeine 120 mg/kg intraperitoneally [IP] and dobutamine 60 μg/kg IP, sequentially) and control (n = 8) groups. In addition, a group of 7 rats were pretreated with dantrolene (10 mg/kg, IP) 30 minutes before the C+D challenge and another group of 8 rats were pretreated with ivabradine (5 mg/kg, IP) 30 minutes before the C+D challenge.

C+D challenge induced spontaneous premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) in 7 of 8 rats and BD-VT (lasted 4.3 ±2.9 minutes, terminated spontaneously) in 6 of 8 (75%) rats. No ventricular arrhythmia was induced in the control group (

< .05 vs C+D group). Dantrolene treatment significantly decreased BD-VT (1 of 7 rats in the Dantrolene+C+D group vs 6 of 8 rats in C+D group,

< .05). Ivabradine treatment did not affect C+D-induced BD-VT (7 of 8 rats in the Ivabradine+C+D group vs 6 of 8 in the C+D group,

> .05).

Caffeine and dobutamine challenge induces BD-VT in a majority of normal rats. Stabilizing cardiac ryanodine receptors with dantrolene treatment can significantly decrease the occurrence of BD-VT, but pacemaker channel blocker ivabradine treatment does not have effect in this animal model.

Caffeine and dobutamine challenge induces BD-VT in a majority of normal rats. Stabilizing cardiac ryanodine receptors with dantrolene treatment can significantly decrease the occurrence of BD-VT, but pacemaker channel blocker ivabradine treatment does not have effect in this animal model.

Screening for asymptomatic, undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) has the potential to allow earlier treatment, possibly resulting in prevention of strokes, but also to increase medical resource utilization.

To compare healthcare utilization rates during the year following initiation of screening among participants screened for AF by electrocardiogram (ECG) sensor patch compared with a matched observational control group.

A total of 1718 participants recruited from a health care plan based on age and comorbidities who were screened with an ECG patch (actively monitored group) as part of a prospective, pragmatic research trial were matched by age, sex, and CHA

DS

-VASc score with 3371 members from the same health plan (observational control group). Healthcare utilization, including visits, prescriptions, procedures, and diagnoses, during the 1 year following screening was compared between the groups using health plan claims data.

Overall, the actively monitored group had significantly higher rates of cardiology visits (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] [95% confidence interval (CI)] 1.

Autoři článku: Gouldriise4468 (Albrektsen Higgins)