Mccartneystafford1560

Brain pathology was also exacerbated in SD with CHI group as compared to SD or CHI alone together with a significant reduction in α-MSH and BDNF levels in plasma and brain and enhanced level of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Exogenous administration of α-MSH (250μg/kg) together with MSCs (1×106) and cerebrolysin (a balanced composition of several neurotrophic factors and active peptide fragments) (5mL/kg) significantly induced neuroprotection in SD with CHI. Interestingly, TiO2 nanowired delivery of α-MSH (100μg), MSCs, and cerebrolysin (2.5mL/kg) induced enhanced neuroprotection with higher levels of α-MSH and BDNF and decreased the TNF-α in SD with CHI. These observations are the first to show that TiO2 nanowired administration of α-MSH, MSCs and cerebrolysin induces superior neuroprotection following SD in CHI, not reported earlier. The clinical significance of our findings in light of the current literature is discussed.Despite significant improvement in understanding of molecular underpinnings driving glioblastoma, there is minimal improvement in overall survival of patients. This poor outcome is caused in part by traditional designs of early phase clinical trials, which focus on clinical assessments of drug toxicity and response. Window of opportunity trials overcome this shortcoming by assessing drug-induced on-target molecular alterations in post-treatment human tumor specimens. This article provides an overview of window of opportunity trials, including novel designs for incorporating biologic end points into early stage trials in context of brain tumors, and examples of successfully executed window of opportunity trials for glioblastoma.Whenever possible, maximal safe resection is the first intervention for management of glioblastoma. Resection offers tissue for diagnosis, decompression of the brain, cytoreduction, and has been associated with prolonged survival in numerous retrospective studies. In this review, we provide a critical overview of the literature associating glioblastoma resection with survival. We discuss techniques that enhance extent of resection, and the role of clinical and surgeon-variables. At last, we analyze the covariates and confounders that might influence the relationship between extent of resection and survival for glioblastoma, as these might ultimately also influence outcomes and other therapeutic interventions tested in trials.Although surgical resection of the solid tumor component of glioblastoma has been shown to provide a survival advantage, it will never be a curative procedure. Yet, systemically applied adjuvants (radiation therapy and chemotherapy) also are not curative and their options are limited by the inability of most agents to cross the blood-brain barrier. Direct delivery of adjuvant therapies during a surgical procedure potentially provides an approach to bypass the blood-brain barrier and effectively treat residual tumor cells. This article summarizes the approaches and therapeutics that have been evaluated to date, and challenges that remain to be overcome.Intraoperative functional mapping of tumor and peri-tumor tissue is a well-established technique for avoiding permanent neurologic deficits and maximizing extent of resection. Motor, language, and other cognitive domains may be assessed with intraoperative tasks. This article describes techniques used for motor and language mapping including awake mapping considerations in addition to less traditional intraoperative testing paradigms for cognition. It also discusses complications associated with mapping and insights into complication avoidance.Although intraoperative mapping of brain areas was shown to promote greater extent of resection and reduce functional deficits, this was shown only recently for some noninvasive techniques. Yet, proper surgical planning, indication, and patient consultation require reliable noninvasive techniques. Because functional magnetic resonance imaging, tractography, and neurophysiologic methods like navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and magnetoencephalography allow identifying eloquent areas prior to resective surgery and tailor the surgical approach, this article provides an overview on the individual strengths and limitations of each modality.Fluorescence-guided surgery provides surgeons with improved visualization of tumor tissue in the operating room to allow for maximal safe resection of brain tumors. Multiple fluorescent agents have been studied for fluorescence-guided surgery. Both nontargeted and targeted fluorescent agents are currently being used for glioblastoma multiforme visualization and resection. Fluorescence detection in the visible light or near infrared spectrum is possible. Visualization device advancements have permitted greater detection of fluorescence down to the cellular level, which may provide even greater ability for the neurosurgeon to resect tumors.This article discusses intraoperative imaging techniques used during high-grade glioma surgery. Gliomas can be difficult to differentiate from surrounding tissue during surgery. Intraoperative imaging helps to alleviate problems encountered during glioma surgery, such as brain shift and residual tumor. There are a variety of modalities available all of which aim to give the surgeon more information, address brain shift, identify residual tumor, and increase the extent of surgical resection. The article starts with a brief introduction followed by a review of with the latest advances in intraoperative ultrasound, intraoperative MRI, and intraoperative computed tomography.Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) has an established role as a crucial disease parameter in the multidisciplinary management of glioblastoma, guiding diagnosis, treatment planning, assessment, and follow-up. Yet, cMRI cannot provide adequate information regarding tissue heterogeneity and the infiltrative extent beyond the contrast enhancement. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging and PET and newer analytical methods are transforming images into data (radiomics) and providing noninvasive biomarkers of molecular features (radiogenomics), conveying enhanced information for improving decision making in surgery. This review analyzes the shift from image guidance to information guidance that is relevant for the surgical treatment of glioblastoma.The work of modern neurosurgical glioma practice combines securing accurate diagnoses, under the 2016 revised World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System, with an aggressive and safe surgical pursuit of tumor removal. The evidence base that drives clinical decision-making has undergone a critical reevaluation with the incorporation of molecular classifiers into the updated WHO diagnoses including the 3 most common diffuse gliomas in adults glioblastoma IDH wild-type, astrocytoma IDH mutant, and oligodendroglioma IDH mutant 1p/19q codeleted. The studies that form the foundation of modern practice, and the areas for future inquiry are reviewed.The management of glioblastoma in the elderly population represents a field of growing interest owing a longer life expectancy. In this age group, more than in the young adult, biological age is much more important than chronologic one. The date of birth should not exclude a priori access of treatments. Maximal safe resection is proved to be the first option when performance status and general health is good. Adjuvant therapy and decision about management of recurrence should be choose in a multidisciplinary group according to performance of the patients and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyl-transferase methylation.Reoperation for glioma is increasingly common but there is neither firm agreement on the indications nor unequivocally proven benefit from clinical trials. Patient and tumor factors should be considered when offering reoperation and a clear surgical goal set. Reoperation is challenging because of placement of previous incisions, wound devascularization by preceding radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, chronic steroid use, the need for further adjuvant therapy, and adherent and defective dura. This article reviews indications, challenges, and recommendations for repeat surgery in the patient with glioma.Glioblastoma (GBM) is infiltrative neoplasm with limited treatment options and poor overall survival. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) allows spatially precise and conformal delivery of high doses of radiation. Salvage SRS for locally recurrent GBM was shown to improve patient survival and have more favorable safety profile than repeated surgical resection. Boost SRS after fractionated radiation therapy is sometimes attempted; however, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 93-05 randomized clinical trial did not demonstrate benefits of upfront SRS that was administered before fractionated radiation. Administration of bevacizumab with SRS is associated with improved survival and can allow SRS dose escalation.The previous decade has seen an expansion in the use of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for a variety of pathologies. LITT has been used to treat both newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma (GBM), especially in deep-seated, difficult-to-access lesions where open resection is otherwise infeasible or in patients who would not tolerate craniotomy. This review aims to describe the current state of the technology and operative technique, as well as summarize the outcomes data and future research regarding LITT as a treatment of GBM.The clinical presentation of glioblastomas is varied, and definitive diagnosis requires pathologic examination and study of the tissue. Management of glioblastomas includes surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, with surgery playing an important role in the prognosis of these patients. Awake craniotomy plays a crucial role in tumors in or adjacent to eloquent areas, allowing surgeons to maximize resection, while minimizing iatrogenic deficits. However, the prognosis remains dismal. This article presents the perioperative management of patients with glioblastoma including tools and surgical adjuncts to maximize extent of resection and minimize poor outcomes.

This systematic review aimed to evaluate oncologic and reproductive outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) for early-stage cervical cancer (early CC).

Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from 1980 to the present using Medical Subject Headings terms; other controlled vocabulary terms; and keywords related to fertility, cervical cancer, and surgical techniques.

A total of 2415 studies were screened, with 53 studies included. Studies reporting recurrences with a median follow-up of 12 months in early CC (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stages IA with lymphovascular space invasion, IB, or IIA) of traditional histologic type undergoing FSS were included.

The studies were grouped by intervention, including vaginal radical trachelectomy (VRT), abdominal radical trachelectomy (ART), minimally invasive radical trachelectomy (MIS-RT), and conization or simple trachelectomy (ST), and studies involving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Combined rates of and conization or simple trachelectomy (ST), and studies involving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Combined rates of recurrence (RR), cancer death (CDR), pregnancy (PR), and live birth (LBR) were calculated per procedure on the basis of all included studies that reported outcomes on that procedure. The results were as follows VRT RR 4%, CDR 1.7%, PR 49.4%, and LBR 65.0% ART RR 3.9%, CDR 1.4%, PR 43.2%, and LBR 44.0% MIS-RT RR 4.2%, CDR 0.7%, PR 36.2%, and LBR 57.1% Cone or ST RR 4.2%, CDR 0.8%, PR 55.1%, and LBR 71.9% NACT RR 7.5% and CDR 2.0% CONCLUSION FSS of early CC with VRT, ART, or MIS-RT have comparable oncologic outcomes in carefully selected patients, with reproductive outcomes favoring VRT. Data on nonradical FSS with cone or ST are less robust but support similar oncologic outcomes to radical trachelectomy with fewer reproductive complications. NACT in this setting requires more investigation before routine implementation into practice.