Zobrazení zdroje stránky Sahinpate3476

Patient characteristics, operative methods, lesioning parameters, patient follow-up, and outcomes were variably reported across the studies. Where relevant outcome data were available, 97% of patients experienced initial pain relief and 79% experienced significant lasting relief. Adverse events were typically transient. We conclude that radiofrequency thalamotomy for cancer pain is well tolerated and can produce significant relief from intractable cancer pain. No superiority of thalamic target could be determined.<br /><br /> We compared the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after 3- and 4-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in a retrospective cohort study.<br /><br /> Patients who had undergone primary 3- or 4-level ACDF were retrospectively identified. [https://www.selleckchem.com/products/amg510.html find more] The demographic data and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected through a review of the medical records. PROM surveys were administered preoperatively for baseline measurements and at 1 year postoperatively. The surveys included the Neck Disability Index, 12-item short-form physical component summary, 12-item short-form mental component summary, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain. The cervical sagittal alignment parameters included C2-C7 lordosis, segmental lordosis, the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and the T1 slope. Multivariate regression models were used to compare the changes in the PROMs and radiographic measurements over time between 3- and 4-level ACDF. Correlation coefficients were calculated to compare the delrrelated with the changes in clinical outcomes.<br /><br />Patients undergoing both 3- and 4-level ACDF experienced significant clinical improvement without significant differences between the 2 groups. The radiographic measures of segmental lordosis and SVA also correlated with the changes in clinical outcomes.<br /><br /> Electrophysiologic mapping (EM) has been instrumental in advancing neuroscience and ensuring accurate lead placement for deep brain stimulation. However, EM is associated with increased operative time, expense, and potential risk. Intraoperative imaging to verify lead placement provides an opportunity to reassess the clinical role of EM. We investigated whether EM 1) provides new information that corrects suboptimal preoperative target selection by the physician or 2) simply corrects intraoperative stereotactic error, which can instead be quickly corrected with intraoperative imaging.<br /><br /> Deep brain stimulation lead location errors were evaluated by measuring whether repositioning leads based on EM directed the final lead placement 1) away from or 2) toward the original target. We retrospectively identified 50 patients with 61 leads that required repositioning directed by EM. The stereotactic coordinates of each lead were determined with intraoperative computed tomography.<br /><br /> In 45 of 61 leads (74%), the electrophysiologically directed repositioning moved the lead toward the initial target. The mean radial errors between the preoperative plan and targeted contact coordinates before and after repositioning were 2.2 and 1.5 mm, respectively (P &lt; 0.001). Microelectrode recording was more likely than test stimulation to direct leads toward the initial target (88% vs. 63%; P= 0.03). The nucleus targeted was associated with the likelihood of moving toward the initial target.<br /><br /> Electrophysiologic mapping corrected primarily for errors in lead placement rather than providing new information regarding errors in target selection. Thus, intraoperative imaging and improvements in stereotactic techniques may reduce or even eliminate dependence onEM.<br /><br />Electrophysiologic mapping corrected primarily for errors in lead placement rather than providing new information regarding errors in target selection. Thus, intraoperative imaging and improvements in stereotactic techniques may reduce or even eliminate dependence on EM.<br /><br /> Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) are increasingly diagnosed but treatment is still controversial. Although the descriptions and use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) have increased, comparative studies with standard approaches are rare.<br /><br /> MISIAN (Minimally Invasive Surgery for Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms) is a prospective randomized single-center clinical trial with long-term follow-up comparing different MIS techniques with standard open surgery for treatment of UIAs.<br /><br /> We randomly allocated a standard pterional approach (PtA) or MIS (12) to 111 patients with UIAs of the anterior circulation (mean dome diameter, 6.4 mm; range, 3-20 mm). Patients selected for MIS underwent a second randomization between a transeyelid approach (TelA) or nanopterional approach (NPtA) (11).<br /><br /> Forty-one patients were randomized to and treated with the PtA, 36 with the TelA, and 34 with the NPtA. Only patients treated with PtA had permanent facial nerve palsy (n= 4 [10%]; P= 0.032). MIS cosmetic results were considered better than those of PtA by independent observers (P &lt; 0.001), and less temporal atrophy in the MIS group was also observed (P= 0.0034). The proportion of excellent results was higher in the TelA group than in the NPtA group (86% vs. 67.6%; P= 0.039). Patients undergoing MIS also reported consistently higher satisfaction and quality-of-life scores (P &lt; 0.001).<br /><br /> MIS is superior to standard PtA for microsurgical clipping of small UIAs of the anterior circulation in terms of cosmetic, satisfaction, and quality-of-life outcomes. The TelA or NPtA for UIAs did not show significant outcome differences at 12-18 months.<br /><br />MIS is superior to standard PtA for microsurgical clipping of small UIAs of the anterior circulation in terms of cosmetic, satisfaction, and quality-of-life outcomes. The TelA or NPtA for UIAs did not show significant outcome differences at 12-18 months.<br /><br /> The purpose of our study was to analyze and compare the spino cranial angle (SCA) in patients with degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis (DCS) and asymptomatic controls and to determine whether SCA could help diagnose DCS.<br /><br /> We enrolled 50 patients diagnosed with DCS (4.3%) from among 1168 patients and the same number of asymptomatic participants as the control group by using cervical radiographs. Both groups underwent cervical radiographs and computed tomography at the same time. Various sagittal parameters were measured on computed tomography in a standardized supine position and compared with the asymptomatic control group. The Spearman correlation coefficient was applied to test the correlation among the sagittal parameters in the DCS group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were performed to determine whether SCA could help predict DCS.<br /><br /> Fifty patients were enrolled in the DCS group, and 50 asymptomatic participants were included in the control group.