Zobrazení zdroje stránky Murdockvester4061

may aid clinicians in implementing interventions and in counseling patients before treatment.<br /><br /> Foramen magnum dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF) is a rare disease, with some reported cases of successful treatment. We achieved complete obliteration of the foramen magnum DAVF through microsurgery after complications of endovascular embolization. We reviewed the treatment modalities and outcomes, focusing on pathologic and anatomic features from the literature.<br /><br /> A 65-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with sudden diplopia. [https://www.selleckchem.com/products/ad80.html click here] Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a subarachnoid hemorrhage around the right side of the prepontine cistern, and a foramen magnum DAVF was diagnosed by angiography. Subsequent angiography revealed that the fistula was supplied by the right neuromeningeal trunk of the ascending pharyngeal artery and the right posterior meningeal artery of the vertebral artery (VA), and the veins of the pouch via the fistula were retrogradely draining into the intracranial veins. We aimed to treat complete occlusion endovascularly with balloon-augmented transarterial Onyx injection via the posterior meningeal artery, but Onyx was refluxed to the VA through the anastomosis between the VA and posterior meningeal artery. Onyx subsequently migrated to the top of the basilar artery, causing occlusion, so we urgently removed the Onyx with a stent retriever (Trevo). Several weeks later, we performed complete obliteration of the foramen magnum DAVF via a lateral suboccipital approach with a C1 laminectomy.<br /><br /> Most foramen magnum DAVFs were obliterated completely with only endovascular treatment. Microsurgery is an effective and reliable treatment for incomplete occlusion and complications.<br /><br />Most foramen magnum DAVFs were obliterated completely with only endovascular treatment. Microsurgery is an effective and reliable treatment for incomplete occlusion and complications.<br /><br /> This article discusses the procedure of foramina magnum and Magendie dredging, summarizing the pathologic changes in the intradural region of the craniocervical junction in patients with syringomyelia and the pathophysiologic mechanism of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation obstruction.<br /><br /> Clinical data from 50 adult patients with syringomyelia treated at Xuanwu Hospital from July 2018 to January 2019 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. All operations were performed with foramina magnum and Magendie dredging, and all intradural factors that may have induced the obstruction of CSF circulation were recorded.<br /><br /> Intradural pathology was found in all patients. The pathologic changes that may have caused obstruction of the CSF circulation include tonsil occupying the foramen magnum and overlying foramen of Magendie in 88% (44/50), intertonsillar arachnoid adhesions in 36% (18/50), tonsil to medulla arachnoid adhesions in 18% (9/50), medialized tonsils in 70% (35/50), vermian branch of posterior inferior cerebellar artery in 22% (11/50), arachnoid veil in 16% (8/50), cisterna magna cyst in 4% (2/50), and tonsil to dura mater arachnoid adhesions in 8% (4/50). Mean duration of follow-up was 13.3 months. The long-term effective rate was 96.0%. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging revealed that the size of the syringomyelia was reduced or completely resolved in 88% of patients. The mean preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association score was 12.9 ± 3.1, which improved to 14.7 ± 3.2 (P &lt; 0.05) at last clinical follow-up.<br /><br /> Intradural pathology that causes CSF circulation obstruction exists in many forms. Relieving the obstruction of the foramen magnum and foramen of Magendie is key to surgical treatment.<br /><br />Intradural pathology that causes CSF circulation obstruction exists in many forms. Relieving the obstruction of the foramen magnum and foramen of Magendie is key to surgical treatment.Human necks are vulnerable in train collision accidents. To design a safer cab workspace, the driver neck injury mechanism should be investigated first. In this study, this issue is addressed by investigating how neck injuries are influenced by the cab workspace dimensions. The driver-console-seat dynamic models are developed to quantify the neck injuries. The three-pivot head-neck-upper torso model is used to evaluate the relative rotation angle between head and upper torso (β+γ). The injury mechanism with the larger (β+γ) value results in more severe neck injuries. The decision tree model is established to explore the most important cab workspace dimensional parameter. The driver submarining posture (the driver exhibits the tendency of sliding down from the seat after contacting the console) generates more (β+γ) value than the flipping over behavior (the driver contacts the console and the upper body continues to move over the top of the console). Four neck injury mechanisms are classified, in which the chest-first impact mechanisms are more dangerous than the knee-first impact mechanisms. The distance between the console edge and knee bolster has the greatest effect on the neck injury. This parameter determines the injury mechanism type as it influences the first contact region of the driver. The distance between the console and seat and the pedal height are the secondary dominant attributes. These three parameters should be considered preferentially for establishing driver protection measures.<br /><br /> To determine patterns and barriers for referral to fellowship-trained minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons.<br /><br /> Questionnaire.<br /><br /> United States and its territories and Canada.<br /><br /> Actively practicing general obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs).<br /><br /> Internet-based survey.<br /><br /> Of 157 respondents, 144 (91.7%) general OB/GYNs were included. Subspecialty fellowship training resulted in the exclusion of 13 (8.3%) respondents. A total of 86 respondents (59.7%) considered referral to fellowship-trained minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) subspecialists. The top 3 cited reasons for nonreferral were adequate residency training (n = 84, 58.3%), preference for continuity of care (n = 48, 33.3%), and preference for referral to other subspecialists (n = 46, 31.9%). The top 3 cited reasons for referral to MIGS subspecialists were complex pathology (n = 92, 63.9%), complex medical and/or surgical history (n = 76, 52.8%), and out of scope of practice (n = 53, 36.8%). If providers required intraoperative assistance, respondents consulted an OB/GYN colleague with comparable training (n = 50, 34.