Zobrazení zdroje stránky Mathewskumar6768

To examine demographic and clinical characteristics associated with diagnostic delay in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).<br /><br /> We characterized a retrospective, population-based cohort of incident adult (≥ 18 yrs) patients with PsA from Olmsted County, Minnesota, from 2000-2017. All patients met the classification criteria. [https://www.selleckchem.com/products/bi-2852.html Ras inhibitor] Diagnostic delay was defined as the time from any patient-reported PsA-related joint symptom to a physician diagnosis of PsA. Factors associated with delay in PsA diagnosis were identified through logistic regression models.<br /><br /> Of the 164 incident PsA cases from 2000 to 2017, 162 had a physician or rheumatologist diagnosis. Mean (SD) age was 41.5 (12.6) years and 46% were female. Median time from symptom onset to physician diagnosis was 2.5 years (IQR 0.5-7.3). By 6 months, 38 (23%) received a diagnosis of PsA, 56 (35%) by 1 year, and 73 (45%) by 2 years after symptom onset. No significant trend in diagnostic delay was observed over calendar time. Earlier age at onset of PsA symptoms, higher BMI, and enthesitis were associated with a diagnostic delay of &gt; 2 years, whereas sebopsoriasis was associated with a lower likelihood of delay.<br /><br /> In our study, more than half of PsA patients had a diagnostic delay of &gt; 2 years, and no significant improvement in time to diagnosis was noted between 2000 and 2017. Patients with younger age at PsA symptom onset, higher BMI, or enthesitis before diagnosis were more likely to have a diagnostic delay of &gt; 2 years, whereas patients with sebopsoriasis were less likely to have a diagnostic delay.<br /><br /> 2 years, whereas patients with sebopsoriasis were less likely to have a diagnostic delay.<br /><br /> Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) constitutes one subtype of the hyperinflammatory syndrome hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), and the term MAS-HLH was recently proposed for HLH with underlying autoimmune/autoinflammatory conditions. The mortality of MAS-HLH has been estimated to 5-10%. Here we report our experiences with moderately dosed etoposide in severe MAS-HLH, administered with the objective to effectively reduce severe hyperinflammatory activity with limited side effects.<br /><br /> In addition to conventional anti-inflammatory treatment, moderately dosed etoposide was administered to seven children affected by rapidly progressing MAS-HLH with central nervous system (n=5) and/or pulmonary (n=5) involvement. Three had underlying systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), two atypical sJIA (no arthritis at diagnosis), and two systemic lupus erythematosus. link2 We performed lymphocyte cytotoxicity analyses in all seven and genetic analyses in six.<br /><br /> All children promptly responded to moderately dosed etoposide (50-100 mg/m<br /><br /> once weekly), added to conventional MAS-HLH treatment which was considered insufficient. The mean accumulated etoposide dose was 671 mg/m<br /><br /> (range 300-1,050 mg/m<br /><br /> ), as compared to 1,500 mg/m<br /><br /> recommended the first 8 weeks of the HLH-94/HLH-2004 protocols. One child developed neutropenic fever and another neutropenic sepsis (neutrophils 0.3x10<br /><br /> /L at therapy onset). Five/seven children had low percentages (&lt;5%) circulating NK-cells prior to or in association with diagnosis; NK-cell activity was pathologically low in two/five children studied. Disease-causing variants in HLH-associated genes were not found. All children were alive at latest follow-up (2-9 years after onset); neurological symptoms had normalized in four/five affected children.<br /><br /> Moderately dosed etoposide may be beneficial in severe and/or refractory MAS-HLH.<br /><br />Moderately dosed etoposide may be beneficial in severe and/or refractory MAS-HLH.<br /><br /> To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).<br /><br /> This phase III, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01583374) randomized patients with active AS (111) to placebo, apremilast 20 mg twice daily, or apremilast 30 mg twice daily for 24 weeks, followed by a long-term extension phase (up to 5 yrs). The primary endpoint was Assessment of the Spondyloarthritis international Society 20 (ASAS20) response at Week 16. The effect of treatment on radiographic outcomes after 104 weeks was assessed using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS).<br /><br /> In total, 490 patients with active AS were randomized in the study (placebo n = 164; apremilast 20 mg twice daily n = 163; apremilast 30 mg twice daily n = 163). The primary endpoint of ASAS20 response at Week 16 was not met (placebo 37%; apremilast 20 mg twice daily 35%; apremilast 30 mg twice daily 33%; <br /><br /> = 0.44 vs placebo). At Week 104, mean (SD) changes from baseline in mSASSS were 0.83 (3.6), 0.98 (2.2), and 0.57 (1.9) in patients initially randomized to placebo, apremilast 20 mg twice daily, and apremilast 30 mg twice daily, respectively. The most frequently reported adverse events through Week 104 were diarrhea, nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory infection, and nausea.<br /><br /> No clinical benefit was observed with apremilast treatment in patients with active AS. The safety and tolerability of apremilast were consistent with its known profile.<br /><br />No clinical benefit was observed with apremilast treatment in patients with active AS. The safety and tolerability of apremilast were consistent with its known profile.<br /><br /> To assess trends in incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality following incident CVD events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) onset in 1980- 2009 versus non-RA subjects.<br /><br /> We studied Olmsted County, Minnesota residents with incident RA (age ≥ 18 years, 1987 ACR criteria met in 1980-2009) and non-RA subjects from the same source population with similar age, sex and calendar year of index. All subjects were followed until death, migration, or 12/31/2016. Incident CVD events included myocardial infarction and stroke. Patients with CVD before RA incidence/index date were excluded. Cox models were used to compare incident CVD events by decade, adjusting for age, sex and CVD risk factors.<br /><br /> The study included 905 patients with RA and 904 non-RA subjects. Cumulative incidence of any CVD event was lower in patients with incident RA in 2000s versus 1980s. Hazard Ratio [HR] for any incident CVD 2000s versus 1980s 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.93. The strength of association attenuated after adjustment for anti-rheumatic medication use HR 0.64, 95%CI 0.34-1.22. Patients with RA in 2000s had no excess in CVD over non-RA subjects (HR 0.71, 95%CI0.42-1.19). Risk of death after a CVD event was somewhat lower in patients with RA after 1980s HR 0.54, 95%CI0.33-0.90 in 1990s and HR 0.68, 95%CI0.33-1.41 in 2000s versus 1980s.<br /><br /> Incidence of major CVD events in RA has declined in recent decades. The gap in CVD occurrence between RA patients and the general population is closing. Mortality after CVD events in RA may be improving.<br /><br />Incidence of major CVD events in RA has declined in recent decades. The gap in CVD occurrence between RA patients and the general population is closing. Mortality after CVD events in RA may be improving.<br /><br /> To estimate the prevalence and incidence of multimorbidity (MM) in a population-based cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared to subjects without RA.<br /><br /> Between 1999-2013, residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota with incident RA who met the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria were compared to age- and sex-matched non-RA subjects from the same population. Twenty-five chronic comorbidities from a combination of the Charlson, Elixhauser, and Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Indices were included, excluding rheumatic comorbidities. The Aalen-Johansen method was used to estimate the cumulative incidence of MM (MM2+; ≥ 2 chronic comorbidities) or substantial MM (MM5+; ≥ 5), adjusting for the competing risk of death.<br /><br /> The study included 597 patients with RA and 594 non-RA subjects (70% female, 90% White, mean age 55.5 yrs). At incidence/index date, the prevalence of MM2+ was higher in RA than non-RA subjects (38% RA vs 32% non-RA, <br /><br /> = 0.02), whereas prevalence of MM5+ was similar (5% RA vs. 4% non-RA, <br /><br /> = 0.68). link3 During follow-up (median 11.6 yrs RA, 11.3 yrs non-RA), more patients with RA developed MM2+ (214 RA vs 188 non-RA; adjusted HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.14-1.69). By 10 years after RA incidence/ index, the cumulative incidence of MM2+ was 56.5% among the patients with RA (95% CI 56.5-62.3%) compared with 47.9% among the non-RA (95% CI 42.8-53.7%). Patients with RA showed no evidence of increase in incidence of MM5+ (adjusted HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.93-1.47).<br /><br /> Patients with RA have both a higher prevalence of MM at the time of RA incidence as well as increased incidence thereafter.<br /><br />Patients with RA have both a higher prevalence of MM at the time of RA incidence as well as increased incidence thereafter.The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) held its annual meeting in 2020 in an online format due to travel restrictions during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19; caused by SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. The virtual meeting was attended by 351 rheumatologists, dermatologists, representatives of biopharmaceutical companies, and patient research partners. Similar to previous years, GRAPPA's annual meeting focused on the 3 overlapping missions of education, research, and clinical care of psoriatic disease. Trainee sessions this year included the annual trainee symposium and a grant-writing workshop. Plenary sessions included updates on COVID-19 and psoriatic disease from multispecialty and patient perspectives, and updates on pustular psoriasis and associated musculoskeletal manifestations. Progress on research and updates were presented for the following groups Collaborative Research Network, Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Psoriatic Arthritis Working Group, International Dermatology Outcome Measures, Composite Measures, Education Committee, and Treatment Guidelines. New this year were 3 concurrent workshops on ultrasound assessment of joints and entheses, magnetic resonance imaging of psoriatic arthritis, and pustular psoriasis efficacy endpoints; 6 "Meet the Expert" sessions; and facilitated "poster tours." In our prologue, we introduce the papers that summarize this meeting.A summary of the research conducted by the recipients of the 2019 Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) Research Awards is presented. Dr. Alla Ishchenko's project was "Role of Metabolomics in Diagnosis, Disease Severity, and Progression in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis A 2-year Prospective Pilot Study" and Dr. Zhenrui Shi's project was "Preclinical Analysis of CCR6 and CCL20 in Mouse and Human Joints, Respectively, as Targets of Therapeutic Intervention in Psoriatic Arthritis."Takayasu arteritis (TA) is a rare inflammatory condition of the large blood vessels that affects the aorta and its branches. Young females of Asian descent are typically the most affected by this disease; however, in the United States, most patients with TA are White1,2,3.Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) presents with diverse features of musculoskeletal inflammation that affect both axial and peripheral joints as well as entheses, tenosynovium, and bursae. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging modality that is uniquely capable of identifying pathology in all these structures. The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) Magnetic Resonance Imaging Working Group has increasingly explored diverse MRI methodologies for the purposes of quantifying inflammatory and structural abnormalities in clinical trials and research. The 2020 GRAPPA virtual workshop presented an opportunity to review progress in the field, summarize the status of MRI scoring systems developed for PsA, and review representative patient cases.