Zobrazení zdroje stránky Johanssonalbrechtsen6879

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder. Neuroinflammation induced by microglia plays an important role in the pathogenesis of PD. Long noncoding RNA GAS5 was showed to have significant effects on regulating inflammatory response. Here, we aim to investigate the effects of GAS5 on the inflammatory response of PD, and the underlying mechanism. An in vivo model of PD was established in C57BL/6 mice by rotenone and an in vitro cell model was conducted on microglia by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Our results indicated that GAS5 was upregulated in tissues in a mice model of PD and microglia activated by LPS. Gain- and loss- of functional experiments demonstrated that GAS5 promoted the inflammation of microglia in vitro. Besides, the knockdown of GAS5 repressed the PD progression in vivo. Mechanistically, GAS5 positively regulated the NLRP3 expression via competitively sponging miR-223-3p. Overall, our finding illuminates that GAS5 accelerates PD progression through targeting miR-223-3p/NLRP3 axis.Objective To observe whether and how N-myc downstream-regulated gene 1 (NDRG1) regulates placental angiogenesis via JEG-3 placental-derived cells. Methods Expression of NDRG1 in stably transfected JEG-3 cells was detected using western blot and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Angiogenesis was examined by tube formation assay. The levels of placental growth factor (PLGF) and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) were examined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), PI3K, and AKT was examined by western blot. The relationship between PI3K and NDRG1 was detected by co-immunoprecipitation. Results NDRG1 was significantly down-regulated at both the mRNA and protein level by lentivirus (Lv)-NDRG1-shRNA (P less then 0.001), whereas it was significantly up-regulated by Lv-NDRG1 (P less then 0.001). NDRG1 knockdown significantly increase the expression of PLGF and VEGF in JEG-3 cells (P less then 0.001), while NDRG1 knockdown significantly reduced the secretion of sFlt-1 (P less then 0.001). NDRG1 was specific bound to PI3K, and NDRG1 knockdown significantly up-regulated the expressions of PI3K and AKT in JEG-3 cells (P less then 0.001). Conclusion NDRG1 suppresses angiogenesis in preeclampsia, and the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway may be involved in the regulation of angiogenesis by NDRG1.Japanese medaka embryos were exposed to water accommodated fractions (WAF) and chemically-enhanced WAF of two types of diluted bitumen (dilbit) at concentrations bracketing the EC50s for developmental malformations. Within these treatments, fish were grouped based on the presence or absence of developmental malformations (e.g., blue sac disease (BSD)), and analyzed for novel transcriptomic responses. Microarray analyses identified novel biomarkers and gene networks in dilbit-exposed malformed embryos that were not evident in dilbit-exposed fish without BSD or in controls without dilbit. The top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) included cytochrome P450 transcripts (cyp1) in fish from all dilbit treatments (malformed and non-malformed fish), as well as fibroblast growth factor (fgf7), AHR repressor (ahrr), and squalene monooxygenase (sqle). In dilbit-exposed fish that did not develop BSD, the only reported individual DEG was eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit D (eif3d). However, a number of other pathways were enriched, including melatonin effects on circadian clock and the antioxidant response, estrogen and androgen metabolism as well as many receptor signaling pathways. Pathways associated with hedgehog, steroid biosynthesis, and Wnt signaling were significantly altered between low and high concentrations of dilbit exposure. An effect of the dispersant control on swim bladder development was observed at concentrations 10-fold higher than those used to disperse dilbit, and a number of gene targets unique to fish in this comparison were affected. This suggests that the toxic effects of dispersant may involve alternative mechanisms to dilbit, but cause similar phenotypic responses. This study identified novel biomarkers in fish exposed to dilbit, with or without visual malformations, that can be used to assess the risks of dilbit to aquatic ecosystem health.Ergonomic relationships that minimize muscle activity relative to the creation of cutting stress underpin the design of modern knives, saws, and axes. The Palaeolithic archaeological record, and the &gt; 3 million years of technological behavior that it represents, is predominantly characterized by sharp stone implements used for cutting. To date, we do not know whether Palaeolithic hominins adhered to ergonomic principles when designing stone tools, if lithic technological transitions were linked to ease-of-use advances, or even how muscularly demanding different Palaeolithic tools are on an empirically defined relative basis. Here, we report the results of an experimental program that examines how four key stone tool types, produced between ∼ 3.3 million and ∼ 40 thousand years ago, influence muscle activation in the hominin upper limb. Using standardized laboratory-based tests designed to imitate Pleistocene cutting behaviors, surface electromyography recorded electrical activity (amplitude) in nine muscles across the hand, forearm and shoulder of modern humans during the use of replica Lomekwian, Oldowan, Acheulean and Mousterian stone tools. Results confirm digit flexors and abductors, particularly the first dorsal interosseous and flexor pollicis longus, to be the most heavily recruited muscles during the use of all tool types. Significant differences in muscle activation are, however, identified dependent on the type of stone tool used. Notably, the abductor digiti minimi, flexor pollicis longus, and biceps brachii were highly activated during handaxe use, particularly when compared to the use of Oldowan and Levallois flakes. [https://www.selleckchem.com/products/fetuin-fetal-bovine-serum.html read more] Results are discussed in light of current understanding on the origin of Lower and Middle Palaeolithic technologies, why specific tool types were produced over others during these periods, and the extent to which early hominins produced ergonomically designed tools.