Zobrazení zdroje stránky Humphreyanderson1908

These findings informed the SGDM intervention and the randomized controlled trial evaluation protocol.Background Mid-flexion instability after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a clinical entity that is not well studied and one that has been associated with patient dissatisfaction and inferior outcomes. We sought to provide a comprehensive review of risk factors associated with mid-flexion instability. Methods A comprehensive literature search of PUBMED, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library was performed using keywords "mid flexion," "instability," and "knee arthroplasty" in all possible combinations. All studies published from 2010 to 2020 in English were considered for inclusion. Research design, question studied, and outcomes were recorded for each study. Quantitative and qualitative analysis was performed. Results Eighteen articles meeting inclusion criteria were identified and reviewed. There were 5 computational studies, 5 cadaveric studies, and 8 clinical studies. There were 14 different risk factors investigated in relation to mid-flexion instability after TKA 6 implant-related, 6 technique-related, and 2 patient-related factors. Of these risk factors, 5 had contradictory results published to date, resulting in an inconclusive association with mid-flexion instability. The results of this review suggest that the effects of joint line elevation and radius-of-curvature of the femoral component on mid-flexion instability are inconclusive while articular surface conformity and preoperative joint laxity may play a bigger role than previously thought. Conclusion Mid-flexion instability after TKA is a clinical entity distinct from other established forms of instability. There are patient-related, implant-related, and technique-related factors associated with mid-flexion instability. The majority of the evidence on this topic is derived from computational and cadaveric studies, underscoring the need for further clinical studies.Background Few studies have compared aspirin with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (DOACs = direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We assessed the efficacy and safety of aspirin compared with DOACs for VTE prophylaxis after THA and TKA using the world's largest joint arthroplasty registry. Methods We studied the National Joint Registry linked to English hospital inpatient episodes for 218,650 THA and TKA patients. Patients receiving aspirin were matched separately to patients receiving direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors using propensity scores. [https://www.selleckchem.com/products/jq1.html see more] Outcomes assessed at 90 days included VTE, length of stay, and adverse events. Results After THA, there was a significantly lower risk of VTE associated with the use of direct thrombin inhibitors (0.44%; odds ratio [OR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.55-0.87; P = .002) and factor Xa inhibitors (0.37%; OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.85; P = .003) compared with aspirin (0.63%). After THA, direct thrombin inhibitors (coefficient, -0.37 days; 95% CI, -0.43 to -0.31; P less then .001) and factor Xa inhibitors (coefficient, -0.80 days; 95% CI, -0.87 to -0.74; P less then .001) were associated with a reduced length of stay compared with aspirin. Similar findings for both outcomes were observed after TKA. Compared with aspirin, DOACs were not associated with an increase in the risk of short-term revision surgery, reoperation, major hemorrhage, wound disruption, surgical site infection, and mortality. Conclusion After THA and TKA, DOACs were associated with a reduced risk of VTE compared with aspirin. DOACs were associated with a reduced length of stay, and DOACs were not associated with an increase in the risk of further surgery, wound problems, bleeding complications, or mortality compared with aspirin.Purpose The pathogenesis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is multifactorial and attributed to the production of several cell-associated and extracellular virulence factors including those implicated in adherence, iron uptake, exoenzymes (Exo) and exotoxins. The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of type III secretion systems (T3SS) effectors in Iranian burn patients with P. aeruginosa wound infection. Methods A systematic search was conducted to identify papers published by Iranian authors in the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar electronic databases during the period of January, 2000 to December, 2018. Publications which met our inclusion criteria were selected for data extraction and analysis by Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software. The inclusion criteria were articles that include burn patients with a wound infection caused by P. aeruginosa, and reported the prevalence of aimed exoenzymes. Results Ten publications were selected out of 15 full-text reviewed articles with the inclusion criteria. Of ten studies, the pooled prevalence of ExoS producing isolates was estimated at 57.1% (95% CI 40.3-72.5%). Five studies reported the prevalence of ExoU and ExoT, from which, the pooled prevalence of ExoU and ExoT producing isolates was estimated at 51.4% (95% CI 31.4-70.9%) and 86.4% (95% CI 48.1-97.8%), respectively. Four studies reported the prevalence of ExoY, from which, the pooled prevalence of ExoY producing isolates was estimated at 79.0% (95% CI 48.6-93.8%). Conclusion Our results showed a remarkable prevalence of T3SS-positive genotype in patients with burn injuries. These findings provided attractive targets for new therapeutic strategies for burn patients who were infected with cytotoxin-producing P. aeruginosa.Burn disasters present a challenge not only to burn centers but the entire healthcare system. Most burn centers worldwide are unprepared to deal with a burn disaster as it is an uncommon event. We investigated the status of burn center preparedness in German-speaking countries to respond to a burn disaster. Self-administered survey questionnaires were sent to the directors of burn centers; the questions of survey used before in a similar way in Belgium were translated into German language. Of the 46 questioned burn centers, 32 (78%) responded, including all of the German adult burn centers. A clear difference in the preparation status of the burn centers in the three countries was observed due to geopolitical factors such as decentralized healthcare systems. However, the healthcare system is generally well-prepared concerning command, transfer, and capacity to provide sustained supplies to handle a massive influx of patients. Nevertheless, there are some gaps in the areas of planning and preparation, funding for disaster activities, and regular training of staff for burn disasters.