Zobrazení zdroje stránky Holmelundsgaard8290

In REFLECT, lenvatinib demonstrated an effect on overall survival (OS) by confirmation of noninferiority to sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. This analysis assessed correlations between serum or tissue biomarkers and efficacy outcomes from REFLECT.<br /><br /> Serum biomarkers (VEGF, ANG2, FGF19, FGF21, and FGF23) were measured by ELISA. Gene expression in tumor tissues was measured by the nCounter PanCancer Pathways Panel. Pharmacodynamic changes in serum biomarker levels from baseline, and associations of clinical outcomes with baseline biomarker levels, were evaluated.<br /><br /> Four hundred and seven patients were included in the serum analysis set (lenvatinib <br /><br /> = 279, sorafenib <br /><br /> = 128); 58 patients were included in the gene-expression analysis set (lenvatinib <br /><br /> = 34, sorafenib <br /><br /> = 24). Both treatments were associated with increases in VEGF; only lenvatinib was associated with increases in FGF19 and FGF23 at all time points. Lenvatinib-treated responders had greater increases in FGF19 and FGF23 versus nonresponders at cycle 4, day 1 (FGF19 55.2% vs. 18.3%, <br /><br /> = 0.014; FGF23 48.4% vs. 16.4%, <br /><br /> = 0.0022, respectively). Higher baseline VEGF, ANG2, and FGF21 correlated with shorter OS in both treatment groups. OS was longer for lenvatinib than sorafenib [median, 10.9 vs. 6.8 months, respectively; HR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.33-0.85; <br /><br /> interaction = 0.0397] with higher baseline FGF21. In tumor tissue biomarker analysis, VEGF/FGF-enriched groups showed improved OS with lenvatinib versus the intermediate VEGF/FGF group (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16-0.91; <br /><br /> = 0.0253).<br /><br /> Higher baseline levels of VEGF, FGF21, and ANG2 may be prognostic for shorter OS. Higher baseline FGF21 may be predictive for longer OS with lenvatinib compared with sorafenib, but this needs confirmation.<br /><br />Higher baseline levels of VEGF, FGF21, and ANG2 may be prognostic for shorter OS. Higher baseline FGF21 may be predictive for longer OS with lenvatinib compared with sorafenib, but this needs confirmation.<br /><br /> Use of circulating tumor DNA for diagnosis is limited regarding the low number of target molecules in early stage tumors. HPV-associated carcinomas represent a privileged model using circulating viral DNA (ctHPV DNA) as a tumor marker. However, the plurality of HPV genotypes represents a challenge. The NGS-based CaptHPV approach is able to characterize any HPV DNA sequence. To assess the ability of this method to establish the diagnosis of HPV-associated cancer via a blood sample, we analyzed ctHPV DNA in HPV-positive or HPV-negative carcinomas.<br /><br /> Patients (135) from France and Senegal with carcinoma developed in the uterine cervix (74), oropharynx (25), oral cavity (19), anus (12), and vulva (5) were prospectively registered. Matched tumor tissue and blood samples (10 ml) were taken before treatment and independently analyzed using the CaptHPV method.<br /><br /> HPV prevalence in tumors was 60.0% (81/135) (15 different genotypes). Viral analysis of plasmas compared to tumors was available for 134 patients. In the group of 80 patients with HPV-positive tumors, 77 were also positive in plasma (sensitivity 95.0%); in the group of 54 patients with HPV-negative tumors, one was positive in plasma (specificity 98.1%). In most cases, the complete HPV pattern observed in tumors could be established from the analysis of ctHPV DNA.<br /><br /> In patients with carcinoma associated with any HPV genotype, a complete viral genome characterization can be obtained via the analysis of a standard blood sample. This should favor the development of non-invasive diagnostic tests providing the identification of personalized tumor markers.<br /><br />In patients with carcinoma associated with any HPV genotype, a complete viral genome characterization can be obtained via the analysis of a standard blood sample. This should favor the development of non-invasive diagnostic tests providing the identification of personalized tumor markers.<br /><br /> PD-(L)1-targeted therapies have shown modest survival benefit in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). [https://www.selleckchem.com/JAK.html www.selleckchem.com/JAK.html] PD-L1+ microenvironments in TNBC are not well-characterized and may inform combinatorial immune therapies. Herein, we characterized clinicopathologic features, RNA-based immune signatures and spatially-defined protein-based immune microenvironments (TIME) in early-stage PD-L1+ and PD-L1- TNBC.<br /><br /> From a large cohort of chemotherapy-naïve TNBC, clinicopathologic features, deconvoluted RNA immune signatures, and intraepithelial and stromal TIME (Nanostring GeoMX<br /><br /> ) were identified in subsets of PD-L1+ and PD-L1- TNBC, as defined by FDA-approved PD-L1 companion assays.<br /><br /> 228/499 (46%) TNBC were PD-L1+ (SP142 greater than or equal to1% immune cells-positive). Using PD-L1 22C3, 46% had combined positive score (CPS) greater than or equal to 1 and 16% had CPS greater than or equal to10. PD-L1+ TNBC were higher grade with higher TILs (p &lt;0.05). PD-L1 was not associated with improved survival following adjumyeloid-derived and lymphoid features. Spatially-defined PD-L1+TIME were enriched in several clinically-actionable immune proteins. These data may inform future studies on combinatorial immunotherapies for patients with PD-L1+ TNBC.<br /><br /> Men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have limited treatment options after progressing on hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. Here, we evaluate the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) + radium-223 dichloride (radium-223) in men with mCRPC.<br /><br /> This phase Ib study evaluated atezolizumab + radium-223 in men with mCRPC and bone and lymph node and/or visceral metastases that progressed after androgen pathway inhibitor treatment. Following safety assessment of concurrent dosing, 45 men were randomized 111 to concurrent or one of two staggered dosing schedules with either agent introduced one cycle before the other. This was followed by a safety-efficacy expansion cohort (randomized 111). The primary endpoints were safety and objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), PSA responses, and overall survival (OS).<br /><br /> As of October 4, 2019, 44 of 45 men were evaluable. All 44 had ≥1 all-cause adverse event (AE); 23 (52.