Zobrazení zdroje stránky Hogantruelsen3436

To compare clinical outcomes and refractive stability of implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation and femtosecond laser assisted laser <br /><br /> keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for high myopia correction.<br /><br /> The Optical Quality Analysis System (OQAS) was used to evaluate clinical outcomes objectively after operation for high myopia correction. [https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Azacitidine(Vidaza).html 5-Azacytidine DNA Methyltransferase inhibitor] We compared the two procedures in terms of 1-year changes in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), safety index, efficacy index, spherical equivalent, modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff frequency, strehl ratio (SR) and objective scatter index (OSI).<br /><br /> At 1y postoperatively, the safety indices were 1.33±0.27 in ICL group, and 1.17±0.24 in FS-LASIK group. 39.58% in the ICL group and 27.59% in the FS-LASIK group gained CDVA in 2 lines or better than that in preoperative CDVA. The efficacy indices were 1.28±0.22 in ICL group, and 1.13±0.26 in FS-LASIK group. The changes of spherical equivalent from 1wk to 1y postoperatively was -0.12±0.37 D in ICL group, and -0.79±0.58 D in FS-LASIK group (<br /><br /> &lt;0.05). Spherical equivalent within ±0.50 D was achieved in 97.92% in ICL group and 68.97% in FS-LASIK group. MTF cutoff frequency were higher with ICL as compared to FS-LASIK (<br /><br /> &lt;0.05) at each postoperative follow-up stage; for postoperative 1mo later, SR was statistically significant difference between two groups (<br /><br /> &lt;0.05); with no statistically significant difference in OSI between two groups (<br /><br /> &gt;0.05) in postoperative 3mo later.<br /><br /> ICL implantation and FS-LASIK procedures both provide good safety and predictability in high myopia correction. ICL implantation provides better clinical outcomes and refractive stability than FS-LASIK.<br /><br />ICL implantation and FS-LASIK procedures both provide good safety and predictability in high myopia correction. ICL implantation provides better clinical outcomes and refractive stability than FS-LASIK.<br /><br /> To observe changes in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and central choroidal thickness (CCT) of patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to ischemic retinal vein occlusion (iRVO) following intravitreal Conbercept injection.<br /><br /> This retrospective study included 33 eyes from 33 patients who received intravitreal injections of Conbercept for ME secondary to iRVO. Treatments were performed on a 3+<br /><br /> (3+PRN) basis. All of the patients were examined by fundus fluorescein angiography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography at the first visit. Laser photocoagulation was performed in the nonperfusion area of the retina of all eyes after the first injection. BCVA, CMT, and CCT were observed before and after 6mo of treatment. The number of injections necessary to achieve improved vision was also noted.<br /><br /> Following Conbercept treatment, the mean BCVA significantly improved from 0.81±0.39 at baseline to 0.41±0.25 and 0.43±0.29 logMAR in the third and sixth months, respectively (both <br /><br /> =0.000). The CMT of the patients at baseline was 556.75±98.57 µm; 304.78±68.53 and 306.85±76.77 µm 3 and 6mo after treatment, respectively (both <br /><br /> =0.000 <br /><br /> baseline). The CCTs of the patients at baseline, 3 and 6mo after treatment were 304.63±57.83, 271.31±45.53, and 272.29±39.93 µm, respectively (<br /><br /> =0.026 and 0.035 <br /><br /> baseline). No severe adverse event relevant to the therapy was noted, and the average number of injections delivered was 3.35.<br /><br /> Intravitreal Conbercept injection combined with laser photocoagulation appears to be a safe and effective treatment for ME secondary to iRVO in the short-term.<br /><br />Intravitreal Conbercept injection combined with laser photocoagulation appears to be a safe and effective treatment for ME secondary to iRVO in the short-term.<br /><br /> To assess the correlation between disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with uveitis and macular edema (UME) who underwent systemic treatment using optical coherence tomography (OCT).<br /><br /> A retrospective clinical study of 23 patients (30 eyes) with DRIL and 23 patients (31 eyes) without DRIL secondary to UME were included. All patients underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examinations at baseline, 3, 6, and 12mo after local and systemic treatment. The OCT-based parameters included foveal center point thickness (FCPT), mean thickness (MT), and diameters of DRIL in horizontal and vertical directions. BCVA and OCT-based parameters were compared between the two groups. The relationship between each OCT parameter and BCVA was evaluated using linear correlation and regression analysis.<br /><br /> At the initial visit, the mean baseline FCPT was 441.03±128.68 µm in the eyes with DRIL and 337.26±99.31 µm in the eyes without DRIL (<br /><br /> =0.001). No significant differen-determine and robust imaging biomarker that could help predict BCVA prognosis in eyes with UME.<br /><br /> To compare the safety and efficacy of conbercept intravitreal injection and half-dose photodynamic therapy (PDT) in treating chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).<br /><br /> This study was retrospective. Thirty-seven patients (37 eyes) with chronic CSC received conbercept injections while 57 patients (57 eyes) were treated with half-dose PDT. All subjects were followed in 6mo. Outcome measures included change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF).<br /><br /> There was no adverse event observed in either treatment group. At the 6-month follow-up, 26 eyes (70.3%) in the conbercept group and 54 eyes (94.7%) in the half-dose PDT group (<br /><br /> &lt;0.05) reached full resolution of SRF. The mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) BCVA significantly improved (<br /><br /> &lt;0.001) in both treatment groups with better outcome at early phase in the half-dose PDT group (2wk, 1, and 2mo, <br /><br /> &lt;0.05). All subjects experienced significant CMT improvement (<br /><br /> &lt;0.001) with no statistical difference between the two groups (<br /><br /> &gt;0.05). The SFCT also improved in all subjects (<br /><br /> &lt;0.001) with better outcome in the half-dose PDT group (<br /><br /> &lt;0.05).<br /><br /> Both intravitreal conbercept and half-dose PDT are safe to use in treating chronic CSC. By 6mo, both treatment groups are efficacious in improving BCVA, reducing CMT and SFCT, and resolving SRF in eyes with chronic CSC. Half-dose PDT may show better outcome at initial phase of treatment in chronic CSC. Longer follow-up period is necessary to study for long-term effect and safety.<br /><br />Both intravitreal conbercept and half-dose PDT are safe to use in treating chronic CSC. By 6mo, both treatment groups are efficacious in improving BCVA, reducing CMT and SFCT, and resolving SRF in eyes with chronic CSC. Half-dose PDT may show better outcome at initial phase of treatment in chronic CSC. Longer follow-up period is necessary to study for long-term effect and safety.